It's a question we've heard a lot in the last couple of days: Who decided to 
  hold a conference in Houston in July? 
Well, Microsoft did, and the thousands of partners who are descending upon 
  the city this week will likely be met with a Texas-style welcome: temperatures 
  in the 90s (today's high topped out at a relatively cool 92) and high humidity. 
  Great. 
Maybe it's your editor's bias toward Dallas-Fort Worth (mainly Fort Worth), 
  but RCPU has never been a huge fan of Houston. As a native Texan, your editor 
  knows and loves huge swaths of his home state -- Austin, San Antonio, the Hill 
  Country, parts of the Gulf Coast, the desert mountains of West Texas and, of 
  course, Cowtown (or Funkytown, or whatever you want to call Fort Worth). Texas 
  can be beautiful.
  
    |  [Click for larger view.]
 | 
  
But RCPU came to Houston expecting to spend a lot of time in the hotel, and, 
  well...we've been pleasantly surprised. The RCPU team -- four strong for this 
  event -- strolled over to a downtown steakhouse Monday evening for dinner after 
  the show and had a great time and a spectacular meal. Then, we strolled back 
  by Minute Maid Park -- the Astros' stadium, which, we have to say, looks kind 
  of funny from the outside -- and over to a place called Discovery Green.
  
    |  [Click for larger view.]
 | 
  
Discovery Green, officially dedicated in April, is a lovely little park with 
  a small pond and a fairly swanky restaurant (from what we hear; we haven't eaten 
  there) plopped in the middle of it. It's breezy and pleasant -- pretty, really 
  -- and it's right in the middle of downtown, directly across from the convention 
  center. Color us impressed. We had a lot of fun downtown.
Houston's still a bit sprawly for our taste -- our team's two hotels are about 
  15 miles apart -- but it's nothing a good GPS and a city-wise driver can't handle. 
  It's also a bit warm, but good food and Texas friendliness -- along with ice-cold 
  central air conditioning in every building -- go a long way toward making us 
  feel comfortable even when the thermometer climbs toward triple digits.
Let's put it this way: RCPU firmly believes that all conferences from now on 
  should be held in San Diego, America's 
  most beautiful city...preferably in March, when it's 33 and sleeting in 
  Boston. But we'll take Houston any time of year over the schmaltz 
  of Orlando or the sensory overload of Vegas. (Most people would probably 
  prefer Vegas, though -- your editor acknowledges being an exception in that 
  regard.) 
So, maybe it's the melted-in-our-mouths filet mignon talking, but we'll give 
  Houston an unexpected thumbs up...for now. There's still a lot of conference 
  to go, but as long as the AC works in the convention center, we should be just 
  fine.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 08, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Last week's 
launch 
  by Microsoft of Hyper-V brought out the enthusiasts right out of the gate, 
  as even gritty bloggers recognized that the hypervisor's price tag as part of 
  Windows Server 2008 (that is, free) is 
pretty 
  alluring. 
However, as we expected, not everybody is all that thrilled so far. We've been 
  hearing little tidbits here and there about how VMware and its ESX competitor 
  don't need to lose any virtual sleep over Hyper-V, but Angelo sent us the most 
  detailed user review of Microsoft's newest creation that we've seen yet:
 
  "I have been experimenting with this 'new' product that is supposed 
    to compete with VMware ESX. And I have several notes that you and others should 
    be aware of.
  
    -  Every time any Microsoft OS patches are deployed, you begin having 
      issues with the guest OSes. I have tried different update orders: host first, 
      then Guest (ugly); guests first.
    -  There is no easy way to set up isolation networks and determine which 
      guests are attached to each virtual network.
    -  There is no reporting on the VM utilization of CPU, memory, drive 
      or network.
    -  There is no native support for cluster in a box (CIAB), without purchasing 
      expensive SANs.
    -  Provisioning new workstations is still a massive undertaking, and 
      keeping that image patched or up to date poses a real challenge. 
As far as I am concerned, it is a nice toy to play with, but if you want 
    to get work done, stick with what works. The strength and power that VMware 
    has are well worth the money."
Thanks, Angelo. So, there you go -- not everybody's in line with the claim 
  that users won't give anything up when switching from ESX to Hyper-V. We expect 
  more of these e-mails in the days and weeks to come, both in support of ESX 
  and in defense of Hyper-V. Help us fill out or collection by contributing at 
  [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 02, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Yeesh, this is kind of ugly. The "tel" (or just the "Intel," 
  depending on how you read it) in Wintel is 
saying 
  no to Vista. 
There's really nothing left to say here, but we're sort of enjoying looking 
  at the Vista car wreck from the traffic jam on the (hello, early '90s phrase) 
  information superhighway. 
Suggestions to Microsoft, which finally (mostly) killed XP yesterday: Bring 
  back XP, get Windows 7 down to being manageable, and let us all forget about 
  Vista. In other words, listen to most of your customers and partners. Please. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 02, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    It's the biggest show of the year for Microsoft Partners and the biggest event 
  of the year for 
Redmond Channel Partner magazine and RCPU alike: It's 
  the 
Microsoft 
  Worldwide Partner Conference, and it kicks off next week in Houston. 
Before you go, you simply must check out RCP's 
  preview video, starring your editor and RCP Editor in Chief Scott 
  Bekker (although not necessarily in that order -- you might say that this video 
  has no lone star). 
We'll be at the WPC in a big way; you might even say that we're going to cover 
  this event Texas-style, pardners. Yee-haw! (OK, we promise not to bombard you 
  with too much Texas shtick over the next two weeks. Then again, just how much 
  Texas shtick is too much? Remember, your editor is a native.) 
Anyway, we'll have a special portal just gushing information (like Spindletop) 
  at RCPmag.com/wpc, and we'll be blogging 
  our fingers to the bone, so check in frequently for updates. (You can even get 
  a headstart right now by checking out Scott's entries on the speaker 
  lineup and attendance 
  numbers. In fact, you might just want to sit at your laptop and reload the 
  portal all day.) Also, check your inbox for show-themed issues of RCPU written 
  by your editor and by Mr. Bekker -- starting with a special edition this Sunday 
  penned by the EIC his own self. 
We're also going to have a wrap-up video online at some point during the week 
  of the show, which you won't want to miss, especially if you saw the preview 
  video (which, if you haven't, you should now). 
So, we'll see you in Houston -- or online -- next week. Oh, and by the way, 
  there won't be an RCPU on Thursday. Happy July 4, everybody! (And, for our fellow 
  Americans specifically, happy Independence Day!) 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 02, 20081 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Yes, this should make things much...easier? Microsoft this week introduced 
  
Select Plus 
  Volume Licensing, a program intended to simplify and reduce the cost of 
  licensing for larger organizations. (We'll forgive Microsoft for giving this 
  program a name that sounds more like the name of a frequent flyer scheme: "We'd 
  like to board our Select Plus passengers at this timeā¦")
Anyway, there's a pretty good synopsis of Select Plus here, 
  and, of course, there's Microsoft's 
  press release on the plan. Now, maybe we're just obtuse, but none of this 
  actually seems very simple. In fact, it seems pretty darn complicated and dense.
Regardless, Wall Street-types are concerned that the discounts in the plan 
  will hurt 
  Redmond's profit margins, while somebody at Forrester, at least, thinks 
  that the plan will be mostly good 
  for bigger companies. 
Here at RCPU, we're...well, we're not really sure yet what this means for partners, 
  but we'd love for you to clue us in at [email protected]. 
  So, uh, go ahead and do that. Thanks.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 02, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Your editor is writing this entry from his childhood home outside of Dallas, 
  a place that always brings back memories of, well, childhood. Now that we're 
  stretching into the third or fourth inning of summer, a lot of those memories 
  are of playing baseball and soccer in the backyard and then weaving into the 
  house completely dehydrated (hey, it gets hot in Texas) and gulping gallons 
  of water. But one piece of news this week stirred our recollection of another 
  summer standard: the summer reading list. 
At the end of every school year, some well-intentioned teacher would give her 
  students a list of books to read over the summer -- without the power of actually 
  being able to "assign" them. The more intellectual kids probably read 
  them, but your editor never did, preferring instead to devour Sports Illustrated 
  and the Dallas Morning News (yes, even as a kid) and then participate 
  in the aforementioned outdoor sporting activities. 
Well, this summer, Microsoft has its own suggested reading, which should prove 
  more popular among certain audiences than the old summer reading list did in 
  this house: Redmond has released 
  "Version 1.0" of documentation on some of the protocols in its 
  most important products. 
This is the stuff that Bill Gates -- you 
  might remember him as Microsoft's former CEO -- never wanted to publish. 
  But antitrust suits forced Microsoft's hand, and now the company's all 
  about interoperability and openness. This week's dump includes information 
  on protocols used in Exchange Server 2007, SharePoint Server 2007 and Office 
  2007, among other big-name Microsoft offerings.
So, who's hauling this tome to the beach or skipping a pick-up soccer game 
  to stay inside and read? Well, the European Union's competition cranks, for 
  sure, given that the existence of this documentation is as much their doing 
  as anybody else's, and given that they're 
  still not convinced that Microsoft is interested in interoperability. (Ha! 
  Just try to take the whole month of August off and still finish reading this 
  stuff by fall, Eurocrats.) But other audiences of immediate interest to Microsoft 
  will be turning pages, as well.
Specifically, the Office stuff will appeal to the nations 
  and organizations 
  that contend that Office Open XML, currently 
  an industry standard with a big asterisk on it (as in *pending 
  appeal), shouldn't be a standard at all. Plus, we imagine that some 
  Microsoft competitors might be a little bit curious about the new documentation. 
Will Microsoft's summer reader be enough to assuage those hostile audiences? 
  We doubt it -- after all, this is really just an update of documentation released 
  in April -- but for Redmond, it's another step on the path to working more readily 
  with other vendors and with the industry as a whole. 
And while we've defended here Microsoft's right to keep proprietary things 
  private, we also can't see all that much of a downside in Microsoft explaining 
  how its stuff works and making it easier for other vendors to work with it. 
  In other words, we have a feeling that divulging these precious trade secrets 
  won't put Microsoft out of business.
As for us, though, we'll be skipping Microsoft's summer page-turner. Next week's 
  Worldwide 
  Partner Conference and other events (along with a complete lack of skill 
  in both sports) will probably cut down severely on the baseball- and soccer-playing, 
  but we're pretty confident that we can still find better things to do this summer 
  than read 50,000 pages of protocol documentation -- like, for instance, anything.
What's your take on Microsoft's new "openness"? Will you be reading 
  all 50,000 pages this summer? Sound off at [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 01, 20081 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    We say 
"finally" 
  because apparently Symantec was all over it weeks ago. 
By the way, should we read anything at all into the fact that Microsoft, which 
  is now more than a year into its effort to be a security vendor, had a "bug" 
  that messed up certain Symantec applications? Hmm, should we? Probably not, 
  but we do like to cause trouble when we can.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 01, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    You might say that Microsoft's record on getting fixes out to its users is 
  becoming a little, uh, 
patchy.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 01, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    It's "Fiji," for heaven's sake. This is a family newsletter! Anyway, 
  apparently, Microsoft's codename of Fiji -- which the company is using for a 
  forthcoming edition of Windows Media Center -- isn't actually going down all 
  that well in...Fiji. Mary Jo Foley 
explains. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on July 01, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    All that noise MSPs have been making about how complicated unified communications can be? Apparently 
it was more than just noise...  
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on June 30, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    What do companies look for when searching for an MSP? This fairly 
comprehensive article  gives us an idea -- which could be useful both for MSPs and the companies searching for them.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on June 30, 20080 comments