Parallels, formerly SWsoft, just 
enhanced 
  its hypervisor
 for Macs that lets these Cupertino beauties run Windows and 
  Linux. 
Parallels Desktop 4.0 supports a staggering 45 different guest OSes, works 
  with DirectX 9.0, and has backup built right in. 
Parallels is a feisty and interesting company, with two lines of server virtualization 
  tools and some cool desktop action, as well. I profiled it a while back 
 More
	
Posted by Doug Barney on November 17, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
     Once Microsoft pre-announces a product with massive competitive implications, 
  it simply won't stop talking about it 'til the darn thing ships -- no matter 
  how long it takes. The idea is to convince customers that Microsoft is the most 
  important game in town, even if it doesn't have a product. 
That's what's happening now with Azure, Microsoft's upcoming cloud services 
  platform. Latest case in point: a speech 
  by David Treadwell that treads over some old Azure ground and then added 
  some news in the form of a real, live (or is that Live?) demo. 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 13, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Microsoft may be busy talking up Azure, but Kevin thinks it's not all that revolutionary:
   Isn't Azure nothing more than the remaking of the mainframe? Think about 
    this: Why do we even need virtualization? Shouldn't you be able to run multiple 
    apps on the same box under one OS? The OS doesn't protect apps from each other, 
    or them from wrecking it. Remember, IBM's Z/OS allowed hundreds, if not thousands, 
    of apps.
   And I'm not even pointing strictly at Windows, as Unix and Linux also 
    seem to need virtualization. Virtualization has its place, but not for 80 
    percent of the servers in a site!
    -Kevin
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 13, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Research firm Computer Economics released a study arguing that IT budgets will 
  be tight next year, but there's 
no 
  real horror show
. The better news? IT shops are keen to keep staff. 
On the chopping block? Equipment upgrades, travel and entertainment, and temps. 
  Let's hope they're right!
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on November 13, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    I made short shrift of the last Patch Tuesday, not taking it too seriously 
  since there were 
only 
  two fixes
, and only one of those critical.
Turns out one of the patches was for more interesting and important than I 
  thought. It seems that Microsoft has had a hole in its Server Message Block 
  -- a hole that took 
  seven solid years to fix! The vulnerability can let hackers control an entire 
  network. Security pros have no idea what took so long, and believe that many 
  may have been hacked this way without even knowing it. 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 13, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Live Mesh is a Microsoft technology that lets you synchronize data across the 
  Internet and keep it all current on different devices. This way your cell phone, 
  home PC and work laptop can all have your girlfriend's phone number, photo and 
  schedule. Oh, and Live Mesh apparently can also be used for business! 
I've been worried that Live Mesh is too complex, will take too long to materialize, 
  that applications then have to be written against it and may, in the end, not 
  work nearly as well as promised. 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 12, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Microsoft made its billions selling packaged software with basic, though sometimes 
  tremendously complex, licenses. You pay for the right to use the software on 
  one or more computers. Moving to the cloud, as the new Azure platform entails, 
  brings a whole new technology, a whole new business model and a whole new set 
  of challenges.
The self-professed brainiacs from Gartner now argue that Azure is the biggest 
  Microsoft event since 1996 when Bill Gates realized the importance of the 
  Internet. 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 12, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Web site Politico, which gained huge traction through the course of the election, 
  
has 
  an article
 light on details and heavy on fear about Google CEO Eric Schmidt 
  and President-elect Barack Obama. 
The theory is that Schmidt is Obama's de facto technical adviser, and 
  that an Obama administration would craft policies more to Google's liking than 
  to Microsoft's. It even quoted an unnamed source (and just one, mind you) who 
  said that Microsoft is "terrified."
  
  I've covered Redmond on and off since 1985 and I've never seen Microsoft terrified, 
  or even really nervous; it's like the John Wayne of software. I don't think 
  Microsoft has any reason to worry, either. One of the key issues is whether 
  the Democrats will get tougher on antitrust, but these days there are just as 
  many Google antitrust issues as Microsoft. 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 12, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Yesterday morning, I got an e-mail from VMware talking about 
virtualization 
  for mobile phones
. I double-checked the date and sure enough, it was Nov. 
  10, not April 1!
Under the VMware Mobile Virtualization Platform, the phone itself is virtualized 
  so that the hardware is separate from the embedded apps (could be a cool way 
  to have an iPhone and Google phone running at the same time, eh what?). 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 11, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Microsoft recently revealed that the next rev of Windows Server 2008 would be 
  able to use 
up 
  to 256 processors
, but Seth isn't really buying the multi-core excitement:
   You're missing the point with the core support: There's virtually no 
    application software out there that will leverage the multi-core systems at 
    the scale they exist at today, and there isn't really need to grow it in the 
    future. The only thing that will need that many cores is a virtualization 
    platform, and even then you're going to have RAM limitations well before you 
    get to the processor bottleneck.
   Show me an application platform that will benefit from the processor 
    scaling and do so cost-effectively in a single chassis, and I'll get excited. 
    Until then, it is just a marketing number that is rather irrelevant. Talking 
    with an MS program manager a couple months back, he let on that 256 processors 
    was probably going to happen, but also that there really is about zero demand 
    for it in the market and that demand isn't expected to grow. It isn't that 
    surprising really.
    -Seth
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 11, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    During the heat of the antitrust prosecutions of Microsoft, the Redmond giant 
  made friends with lots of its enemies. Two former foes remain tight: Novell 
  and Microsoft are doing great work on interoperability, and the Sun deal -- 
  though less dramatic -- is working out, as well. 
This week, in fact, Sun announced that the MSN Toolbar can 
  be downloaded as part of the Java Runtime. That means the Google Toolbar 
  is getting kicked off, at least in the U.S. 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 11, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
     Both Google and Microsoft agree on one thing -- that the airwaves that will 
  be abandoned when we move to digital television should be used for wireless 
  Internet access. The FCC agrees, and is making these airwaves 
available 
  for 'Net services
.
That's the great part. Here's my fear, though: I worry that these spectrums, 
  even though they're unlicensed, will be sold or given to service providers who 
  will charge whatever the market will bear. 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on November 11, 20080 comments