Mailbag: Google Going Evil?
So is Google becoming Microsoft's
? Here's what a few readers thought:
You're dead-on with your assessment of Google. I've had the same concerns
myself for some time now.
I have to echo your thoughts. I had rather positive feelings about Google
until I was invited to an interview at their shiny new datacenter in Central
Oregon last year. After a VERY bizarre interview -- unlike anything I had
ever experienced in 20 years in IT -- I did some more checking and had to
reach the same conclusion. I don't know for sure if Google is evil, but it
is certainly doing a lot to make me think so!
One example: The name of the fake company that it hides behind that houses
their datacenter (the sign outside) is "ValDeMoort Industries."
Now, I have to ask, who would name their datacenter after the ULTIMATE EVIL
character in Harry Potter? It was dumb, but maybe not. Maybe it is really
Honestly, I think Google just suffers from being an extremely immature
company run by extremely immature billionaires. Microsoft has had the advantage
of 30 years of experience, BG hired some of the top business managers in the
world right out of the gate, and he "grew into" his success.
Nope, I totally agree with you. While I'm a MS partner and respect MS,
I don't always agree with them either -- but at least you can talk to someone.
Google bought Postini recently. If Postini weren't such a great product,
we would have dumped it 100 percent becuase of the crap we have been going
through. And this is an understatement.
Yes, I think Google has too much and it needs to be cut back. No one should
get any slice of Yahoo; it should stand on its own two feet. Ditto with MS
on the same subject, so yeah -- they are becoming the evil twins.
And do you think that MS buying Yahoo's search business will help MS?
I don't think it will help at all. MS will screw it up and it will burn. The
problem that I see is that what will Yahoo then get for income to do other
things such as its one-of-a-kind chat system which feature-for feature kills
anyone else? I would invest in Yahoo, but only if King Carl steps down and
I guess I would rather opt for free services from a vendor that provides
open source options for those not willing to fork out money for an expensive
OS that is unreliable, less secure and a huge resource hog. I can't wait for
the Google phone.
I live in a Microsoft/Dynamics world all day long and I'm happy with that
world -- it keeps that regular paycheck coming. But I don't want to see a
monopolists dictating to that world, Microsoft, Google or anyone else.
Doug recently asked readers to name their favorite defunct IT magazines. Here
are some of your nominations:
I'll take InfoWorld over any of the others any day. I wouldn't
say it's defunct either. I continue to get lots of good stuff from them.
It's still in print, but nothing the way it was in the "good old
days." The magazine: Computer Shopper. To pore over the endless
advertisements when looking to build your own systems was priceless.
My favorite defunct magazine is not one related to my current occupation:
Drag Racing USA. Back in the '70s, before it went defunct, this magazine
covered both the races and the newest machines, regardless of what class the
car was in.
One of the last magazines that I received featured a new short dragster
that Big Daddy built and called the Swamp Rat. Two weeks later, I'm at my
local drag strip, Renegade Raceway. Don Garlits brought his longer dragster
and raced it. While I was walking through the pits, he was signing some pictures
for fans. When he was signing a picture for me, I asked him, "Where is
the Swamp Rat?" He looked at me kinda funny and asked, "Where did
you hear about that?" I told him, "In Drag Racing USA."
Turns out it was Don's favorite magazine, too, and I got to spend quite
a bit of time talking with him between the races about his newest dragster
and his career in general. I regret to say that I no longer have that signed
picture, but I do have the great memory of getting to talk with one of drag
racing's great giants in his prime. That is a memory for a lifetime that would
not have happened without that magazine.
And yesterday, reader Chris suggested
that the iPhone fan who got teased
by a television reporter while waiting in line should've responded with
some snark. One reader thinks that's missing the point:
I think Chris did miss something. It's true that the man in line for
an iPhone didn't exactly "own" the reporter, but he also didn't
sound like he was going to run home and cry. What he said was on the money.
The question was insulting and in no way should pass for news reporting. The
idea of attempting humor in response to such a condescending question is inappropriate,
and acting like the reporter's behavior was funny would have just encouraged
What those news people were doing is like something elementary school
kids do whenever they don't understand something. It was nothing but a smug
attempt at trying to belittle others to make themselves feel better about
themselves. It is a common behavior among luddites or the technically-challenged
to attempt to demean those that understand or enjoy what they do not. If anyone
wants to eschew electronics, then let them continue to bang blocks of wood
together. It's none of my business. I don't see computer experts walking around
with microphones asking everyone without the most recent phone or PDA if they
are virgins or eunuchs.
-A person who doesn't own an iPhone and probably never will
Tell us what you think! Leave a comment below or send an e-mail to email@example.com.
Posted by Doug Barney on July 23, 2008 at 11:52 AM