News
        
        For Some ISVs, Microsoft's BI Shortcomings Are an Opportunity
        
        
        
			- By Stephen Swoyer
- July 11, 2011
For some Microsoft-centric business intelligence (BI)   players, the key to success is knowing how to pick up where Microsoft has left off.
Microsoft ISVs Strategy Companion and   SwiftKnowledge are intent on filling in the gaps in Microsoft's BI offerings, which, the two companies say, are functional enough but appeal to only a subset of potential Microsoft BI consumers. 
 Irvine, Calif.-based Strategy Companion is a veteran Microsoft-centric ISV that   markets a Web-based front-end, dubbed "Analyzer," for SQL Server   Analysis Services (SSAS). Bob Abernethy, the company's senior vice   president and general manager, believes SQL Server-based BI is "poised   for huge growth." Microsoft boasted a strong BI stack even before it   delivered SQL Server 2008 R2 last year, says Abernethy; thanks to the   publicity surrounding both R2 and Microsoft's PowerPivot   column-store-on-a-desktop offering, shops are increasingly hip to what   he calls the "untapped potential" of their SQL Server BI assets. 
"I see an increasing wave of SQL Server shops that are becoming ready   to jump into business intelligence and to use Analysis Services," he   said, citing reference customers like L'Oreal USA and CitiGroup   Inc. "What typically happens is that when [a customer] first buy[s] the   product...they have a group of IT people [that] is building in   conjunction with the business people the initial set of cubes. That's the prerequisite to use Analyzer -- to have   a cube. That's where users are dependent on IT, to get the cubes built.   After that is done, it shouldn't be this back-and-forth thing."
With Analyzer, Strategy Companion is aiming for self-service   analysis.  "Our real focus here is these [business] users, who   understand [the dimensionality of] the data," he explained. "A lot of IT   folks don't know MDX still. Even if they do know MDX, the model still   doesn't work for [business users] to call them up and say 'Hey, Mr. MDX   Developer, write me a new report.' We put that [capability] in the hands   of the business user."
Strategy Companion's approach is similar to that of rival   SwiftKnowledge, which likewise markets a Web-based front-end to   Microsoft's SQL Server BI stack. Strategy Companion is optimized for   Internet Explorer; the company claims to deliver a uniform   experience across any Web browser. 
Minnesota-based SwiftKnowledge plans to expand by targeting specific verticals. First, said CEO David Macey, was banking.
"What [we've] managed to do with just HTML in a browser-agnostic   situation is pretty impressive. [We] developed a true enterprise-class   BI platform," he said. "The problem with business intelligence is   that unless you have a customer that has a data warehouse and actually   knows what they're doing, it is a long struggle to get [to BI], so what   we've done is to build a data warehouse specifically for banks. Today we   can walk into a bank and have an enterprise BI platform up and running   with over 100 dashboards and reports in one day, which is about six   months faster than anyone else can do it."
The banking vertical has been ignored by most BI players, Macey   said, although he conceded that vendors like Hewlett-Packard,   IBM, Information Builders Inc. (IBI), Oracle, SAP and   SAS Institute Inc. do market banking-oriented BI and analytic solutions. 
The salient point, he said, is that banks need usable BI -- and   that SwiftKnowledge's browser-based interface, which uses HTML to serve   up a dynamic, interactive user experience, is just what they need. 
"We're not trying to go after the enterprise BI market. Trying to   compete with an SAP or an Oracle or an IBM [is] probably not the best   idea. This [banking] is...a data-intensive industry that's been   ignored by BI," Macey said. "A lot of banks only [have the capability   to] do reporting on the previous day's close, or [on] the previous   month's close. What about the previous six months? What about the   previous year? What about five years? You can't stress-test your assets   unless you have a historical record of how you've performed." 
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
            
        
        
                
                    About the Author
                    
                
                    
                    Stephen Swoyer is a Nashville, TN-based freelance journalist who writes about technology.