News
        
        IT Heavyweights Back Telecom Cloud Forum
        
        
        
			- By Jeffrey Schwartz
 - December 10, 2009
 
		
        
		The telecommunications industry has joined the effort to forge interoperability, security and  common service levels among cloud providers by forming a consortium backed by some  key cloud providers, enterprise customers, and hardware and software vendors. 
The TM Forum, an established telecom industry association, launched the Enterprise Cloud Buyers' Council (ECBC) at its annual  Management World Americas conference in Orlando  this week. The ECBC is backed by some key providers including Microsoft, IBM, CA, Hewlett-Packard, Cisco and EMC, as well as telecom providers AT&T, BT, Telecom  Italia and Nokia Siemens Networks. 
Noticeably absent from the list of backers are leading cloud  providers Amazon and Google.
Some analysts were quick to question the need for another cloud  computing consortium, noting numerous other groups such as the Cloud Computing  Interoperability Forum and the Distributed Management Task Force's Open Cloud Standards Incubator. 
"If I could  get a couple of publications to blow kisses at the idea, I could launch a cloud  forum and I could get key players to join it," said Tom Nolle, a  telecom and IT consultant who recently withdrew his involvement in the  TM Forum. 
Citing its track record for providing standards among telecom  carriers, the TM Forum believes it has the clout and expertise to bring cloud  providers together to forge compatibility and universal definitions. 
The ECBC's  goal is to forge common API's for developers, security, product definitions,  SLAs, benchmarking, federated cloud stores and interoperability among cloud  services. It has agreed to follow the initiatives of the DMTF and the  IT Service Management Forum (itSMF), an organization focused on providing service  delivery, as well as guidelines from the National Institute of Standards and  Technology (NIST). 
Microsoft's involvement was particularly noteworthy, given  that it has declined to participate in the Cloud Computing Interoperability Forum. 
"There were a lot of politics  in that that a lot of people didn't want to step into," said Keith  Willetts, the TM Forum's chairman and CEO. 
Microsoft was not available for  comment but endorsed the ECBC in a statement,  saying it is consistent with Microsoft's  effort to support private and hybrid clouds. 
For his part, Nolle said he wasn't surprised by Microsoft's decision to  support the ECBC, noting that Microsoft has long been involved with the  TM Forum. 
The TM Forum maintains it will succeed for one key reason:  It is relying on enterprise customers, who have raised key concerns about cloud services, to bring providers to the table. The ECBC has six major enterprise  customers on board representing such industries as pharmaceuticals, retail and  banking, and has been conducting ongoing discussions with a number of key influencers, according to Willetts.  Only two of those enterprise customers have revealed their membership: Commonwealth Bank of Australia and  Deutsche Bank.
"We've historically brought together buyers and sellers  to really get the buyer requirements of the supplier side lined up,"  Willetts said in an interview. "We've been doing that for quite some time  for the communications industry through  real deep-dive technical working  groups and best practices and standards."
Eric Pulier, ECBC's executive director, emphasized in an  e-mail that the group's charter is focused on forging buyer requirements rather  than more common seller-led efforts. "The result [of seller-led efforts] is  an expensive and unwieldy set of terms, management consoles, commercial  constructs and product descriptions that lead to opaque pricing, inability to  benchmark, high integration costs and vendor lock-in," Pulier said. 
But despite the need to address those issues, the  telecom industry has tended to be slow and bureaucratic in  forging standards, Nolle said. During his tenure with the TM Forum, Nolle said  he was on several committees where forging standards took so long that once done, they  no longer addressed current priorities. 
"I know how these things work and the problem is the  buyers are helplessly trapped in a bureaucratic process, and the thing that  worries me the most about their enterprise initiatives is that the enterprises  have a shorter capital cycle than the providers," Nolle said. 
He also questioned whether the telecom industry has the  chops to work with today's leading cloud providers. "In the days when the  TM Forum was growing up, networks were  built by connecting boxes. Now networks are built by connecting software  components. It's a different world and they're not there yet," he said.
"I think there is a view by the standards guys that the  Amazons and Googles of the world don't participate because they are not in  favor of standards," he added. "That's not true. If you look at  Google Wave, they supported the XMPP standard for federation. What they are  saying is you can't try to standardize something which you haven't even built."
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
            
        
        
                
                    About the Author
                    
                
                    
                    Jeffrey Schwartz is editor of Redmond magazine and also covers cloud computing for Virtualization Review's Cloud Report. In addition, he writes the Channeling the Cloud column for Redmond Channel Partner. Follow him on Twitter @JeffreySchwartz.