Don't let the joys of telecommuting blind you to the perils.
Time to Redecorate!
Don't let the joys of telecommuting blind you to the perils.
- By Em C. Pea
- April 01, 2000
Do you work out of a home office? Auntie has one, though
it’s not her sole place of business (third stool from
the left at Shelly’s WakaWaka Oceanfront Club is one of
the others—don’t tell my beloved). My home office is decorated
in a style you might call NeoAmerican TechnoClutter; systems
are crowded together, keyboards ride on top of papers
and CDs, and the cables have formed their own union.
That’s why this news junkie was interested in a story
that broke just after the beginning of the year. OSHA,
the Occupational Health and Safety Administration, posted
a document on its Web site that said employers would now
be responsible for the safety of home office environments.
Almost immediately, the predictable reactions from various
predictable players predictably came along. Predictably.
Workers’ groups thought this was a good idea. Businesses
most emphatically did not. Auntie’s fave reaction was
the one that pinned OSHA’s authority back to the 1930s,
whining about how much the marketplace has changed, and
how anachronistic rules meant for factories are in The
New Enlightened Millenium. Needless to say, OSHA pulled
the document from its site amidst the brouhaha.
Let’s take a step back and try to add some perspective
to the topic. I don’t want the Feds telling me my keyboard
has to be lowered to a height of 27-3/8 inches, or that
my monitor angle is all wrong. That being said, understand
that telecommuting is a cash cow for many employers. There’s
an oft-referenced AT&T study that concludes workers
are more efficient in home offices than at company HQ.
A home office-based worker doesn’t take up a desk or an
office, which saves big time on real estate costs. Home
offices save your employer(s) or customer(s) major dollars.
And that reference back to the ’30s? Nothing steams me
more than historical revisionism. Uh, Bonzo, those workplace
safety rules were put into place because people were being
injured, or dying before their time, while in the act
of earning a living and generating profits for a business.
OK, the marketplace has changed, and those of us working
in the technology sector don’t have to worry about being
sucked into the sausage grinder, or black lung, or mercury
poisoning, or any number of terminal dangers of workplaces
past. This isn’t to say that we’re off scot-free. Is that
sore wrist the start of carpal tunnel? How’s your back
doing? What happens to the eyes after a few years of 40-plus
hours a week staring into a monitor?
This gal doesn’t want OSHA inspectors hanging around
the lair. She does want the Feds to make sure that employers
can’t ignore an employee’s legitimate concerns about home
office health and safety. Many companies think that showing
a 30-minute video on the topic or printing a up safety
guide satisfies their obligation, and that’s nothing more
than Dilbert-speak at its worst.
The letter of the law should be: Home office employees
should have the resources to do their jobs in the same
safety and comfort as they would at the company office.
It’s not a company’s job to monitor that environment,
nor is it OSHA’s—it’s yours. If you’re afraid to speak
up, you’re only hurting yourself. Literally.
About the Author
Em C. Pea, MCP, is a technology consultant, writer and now budding nanotechnologist who you can expect to turn up somewhere writing about technology once again.