A year ago, Microsoft updated its TechNet Web site with a large focus on modernizing 
  the navigation. Now Jeff Schwartz, a writer for 
Redmond Developer News 
  (our dev book that focuses on management issues -- check 'er out 
here) 
  reports that MSDN is 
getting 
  a similar facelift. 
The programming site is trying to turn from a static library into a dynamic, 
  community resource. Another area of attack? Improving search, which isn't as 
  easy as it seems given that so much of the content revolves around source code.
The coolest part is that Microsoft is just now talking to developers about 
  what they need, so there's still a chance for you to have your say.
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on April 21, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Microsoft may be in a position to replace Windows with its own new OS, after 
  all. Microsoft Research has a brand-new, stripped-down, ready-to-rock OS development 
  called 
Singularity.
The new OS is designed from scratch to resist attacks such as buffer overflows 
  and actually checks code for stability and compatibility before it runs. It 
  all sounds great. But, then again, Microsoft will have to do something about 
  all that backward compatibility.
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on April 14, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Last week, I voiced a few concerns over 
Gartner's 
  analysis of virtualization. The esteemed group argued that PC virtualization 
  will spell the end of "the monolithic, general-purpose operating system" 
  (read: Windows). 
I did an analysis of Windows on the desktop and found it almost 
  impossible to kill. Compatibility, OEMs and the economics of Windows PCs 
  will keep the OS large and in charge for years to come. There's simply nothing 
  that can replace it. The Mac, Linux, mobile devices -- all just nibble around 
  the edges of the Microsoft monopoly.
Now, the Gartner gurus have another proclamation: Windows is collapsing 
  due to its sheer size and the only thing that can save it is virtualization 
  (the exact opposite of the company's first prediction). The idea is for Microsoft 
  to write all-new OS code and use a virtual layer to maintain backward compatibility. 
  It sounds interesting in theory, but these kinds of compatibility layers are 
  always way harder to write than you might think.
Don't these analysts even talk to each other or read each other's press releases? 
  And just what is going to replace Windows? The expensive Mac? Linux? Pure Web? 
  Tell me where I'm wrong and Gartner is right by writing [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on April 14, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    While Microsoft Research preps 
Singularity, the same group has also built a 
  unique system to test out new hardware designs. 
On the surface, it seems like a killer PC, one a geeky teenage game freak might 
  own. It's got a boatload of computer and network interfaces and 64 gigs of RAM. 
  But unlike that sick gaming system, Microsoft's BEE3 
  has a bunch of programmable arrays, so designers can turn it into anything they 
  want without having to build new chips first. 
BEE3 is based on work from UC Berkeley (BEE stands for the Berkeley Emulation 
  Engine) and was built with the help of Canadian design company Celestica.
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on April 14, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    At the recent RSA Security Conference, the talk wasn't just about patches, hackers 
  from Bulgaria and the latest virus. Much of the conversation revolved around 
  
security 
  for virtual shops.
The concept is surprisingly simple and alarmingly scary. If you have 1,000 
  VMs, a single attack can compromise them all. Vendors are just now starting 
  to address these issues, and, fortunately, we haven't had that one killer attack 
  that makes us all rethink the drive to virtualize. VMware is helping by sharing 
  APIs with security companies, who are now starting to build VM-specific tools.
How do you protect your VMs? Clue us all in by writing [email protected]
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on April 14, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    I have written many 
newsletter 
  items and even a 
full-fledged 
  editorial arguing that Yahoo isn't worth nearly $44 billion, and buying 
  it is a backward move for Microsoft.
Maybe Microsoft read some of this stuff or is just getting cold feet. At the 
  very least, Microsoft is reportedly 
  wondering if Yahoo is worth the original bid or if the bean counters from 
  Redmond should knock it down a few bills. 
Late last week and over the weekend, Microsoft pressed 
  Yahoo to accept its offer or else suffer through a proxy fight, hinting 
  that the final price might be lower. So what does a slumping Yahoo do? It argues 
  that it's worth more than 
  Microsoft's offer! 
If I were Microsoft, I'd forget the whole thing and spend all that dough on 
  inventing new technologies.
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on April 07, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    I feel like apologizing every time I write about Patch Tuesday, which is exactly 
  12 times a year. 
The reason I'm so sheepish is that every story is nearly the same, describing 
  remote execution exploits, Internet Explorer holes...you get the picture. But 
  like covering every nuance of the Iraq war or the fight for the Democratic nomination, 
  it's painful, boring and necessary. At least I'll try to keep it short.
 Tomorrow is a relatively busy day, with eight 
  fixes. Again, IE, Office and, of course, Windows are the main victims. Surprisingly, 
  Microsoft Project also gets a little plug. Also unusual are the fixes for JScript 
  and VBScript. Web developers take heed!
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on April 07, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    When it comes to reputation, Gartner is as well-respected as the pope, John 
  McCain and Mother Teresa put together -- despite the fact that a decade ago, 
  Gartner overestimated the cost of owning PCs by about ten-fold. It seems that 
  somehow the gurus from Stamford, Conn. can do no wrong.
In the case 
  of virtualization, Gartner is mostly right, but I have a few bones to pick. 
  First, Gartner says that through 2012, virtualization is the "highest-impact 
  trend in [the] infrastructure and operations market." Check.
Then, the company's press release argues that "storage has already been 
  virtualized" and that PCs and servers are the next frontier. Technically, 
  that may be true; folks have been talking about storage virtualization longer 
  than x86 PC or server virtualization. But how many have actually virtualized 
  their storage? Precious and few. 
Yet another Gartner guru claims that because of PC virtualization, "the 
  days of the monolithic, general-purpose operating system will soon be over." 
Right. Wasn't the Network Computer (a style of PC or desktop virtualization) 
  supposed to kill the PC a decade ago? Wasn't the Web supposed to kill Windows 
  clients five years ago? Like the end of the world, if you predict it long enough, 
  it will eventually happen. 
Have you virtualized your storage, and if so, how? Write me at [email protected] 
  and I'll pass your story along in our next newsletter.
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on April 07, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Our new magazine/Web site/blog/newsletter 
Virtualization 
  Review is fully up and running. In fact, we just printed and shipped 
  tens of thousands of copies of the very first issue. 
Leading our virtualization charge is former Redmond Editor Keith Ward, 
  now editor of Virtualization Review. (Keith is so good, we hire him back 
  every time he leaves for what he thinks are greener pastures. Now he knows the 
  truth: Ain't nothing greener than virtualization!)
Keith is a techie at heart and lately has been messing with a sweet 
  HP loaner server, most recently loading Windows Server 2008 and the beta 
  of Hyper-V. So far, so good. The only glitch was enabling virtualization on 
  HP's Xeon processors before he could successfully load the new Microsoft hypervisor. 
Keith promises a steady stream of reports on various hypervisors -- all from 
  the perspective of a new virtualization user, which most people in IT actually 
  are. Keep up with Keith's blog here 
  or get the RSS feed here.
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on March 31, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    I try to avoid being political in this newsletter, but in this case I'm making 
  an exception. 
Here's the backdrop: Bill Gates has long argued for loosening 
  our Visa rules so companies such as Microsoft can bring in smart people. 
  Bill made this same case in a speech 
  a few weeks ago in front of the U.S. House of Representatives. 
I happen to agree with him. I'm pretty hardcore when it comes to illegal immigration 
  -- and not because I dislike immigration. Just the opposite; I love immigration. 
  My feeling is that illegal immigration restricts a country's ability to welcome 
  legal immigrants. A country should be able to define its immigration strategy, 
  and has the right to give preference to highly educated immigrants. 
I know some people are threatened by smart newcomers stealing the best jobs; 
  things might get more competitive. But how many startups are started up by foreigners? 
  Smart immigrants build economic leadership, invent new things and create some 
  pretty sweet jobs. 
Tell me where I'm wrong at [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on March 31, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Last week, Google 
turned 
  its page black to raise awareness of energy conservation. 
My first thought turned to hypocrisy. Google uses millions of kilowatt hours 
  powering massive server farms so we can look for Kim Kardashian videos. 
Turns out, there was a deeper irony. Apparently, it takes more electricity 
  to power a black screen than a light one.
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on March 31, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Microsoft is taking a fresh stab at enterprise search with 
Windows 
  Search 4.0, designed largely for Windows shops. 
This is a pretty big area, and one that is very easy to test. Any clown can 
  tell you which search works best -- that's why Google rules in Web and desktop 
  searches. It only takes one or two queries before the depth of its indexing 
  proves superior.
The new Microsoft software is in beta, and now works with OneNote (should be 
  called OneCustomer) and Outlook. 
The biggest flaw is its Windows-centricity. Some may run almost all-Microsoft 
  operating systems, but the data is stored in apps from all over. This means 
  you need more than one enterprise search tool if you really want to find things. 
Am I right, or all wet on this issue? Let me know by writing me at [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on March 31, 20080 comments