One stock maven believes that the Wall Street collapse may 
reignite 
  Microsoft's interest in Yahoo
. The theory is that Yahoo is now far cheaper 
  and the value of Microsoft cash is relatively undiminished. 
This could well be true, though I still think buying Yahoo is a terrible me-too 
  idea. And Microsoft has recently 
  spent $80 billion buying back its own stock (a better investment than AIG, 
  I dare say). Does Redmond still have the cash to snag Yahoo? And if not, can 
  it borrow that amount in today's market? You tell me at [email protected]. 
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on October 13, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Tomorrow will be a particularly busy
 
  Patch Tuesday
, and once again remote code execution attacks are taking center 
  stage, with no less than four fixes. Active Directory will get plugged, as will 
  Windows Server 2000, Internet Explorer and Office.
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on October 13, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    It's been a bit of secret how much Microsoft has been pushing SQL Server 2005 
  and 2008 as a business intelligence (BI) platform. But Microsoft doesn't want 
  it to be such a secret anymore, and has a range of 
new 
  features to increase the IQ of BI
 in the next rev of SQL Server. Topping 
  the list? New reporting and analysis services aimed not just at BI gurus, but 
  rank-and-file managers and information workers. 
 
More
	Posted by Doug Barney on October 09, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
     It might not be a reversal of XP's death sentence, but if reports are to be 
  believed, XP did at least get a 
six-month 
  reprieve
 and won't be yanked from OEM hands until July 2009. 
Some say this is a bunch of hooey, but whether or not Microsoft has formally 
  made the decision, I have to believe the company will offer XP as long as humanly 
  possible. After all, people want it, Microsoft gets paid for it and the monopoly 
  remains intact. Where's the downside? There isn't one.
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on October 09, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
     Here's one more scareware story to cap off the week. At least in this one, the 
  user learns his lesson:
   I have a boss, the company vice president yet, who has a bad habit of 
    going places on the Internet that he shouldn't and clicking on things better 
    left unclicked. In the past, I have been able to clean some of the scareware 
    off his system, but the last couple of times I couldn't. The scareware folks 
    had gotten smarter. The first thing they did was disable anything I could 
    use to get rid of their work, such as Task Manager, the Run box, any malware 
    or anti-virus products it could find, and even access to the c: drive (they 
    hid it).
   I basically told him that I couldn't get rid of the crap and that it 
    would take me two days to reformat and reload his machine...two days during 
    which he would have no access to his e-mail or anything else. Since the second 
    two-day outage, he has been behaving himself much better.
    -Phil
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on October 09, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    This isn't the first time this newsletter has warned about the need for better 
  virtualization security. The whole issue is that virtualization is a relatively 
  new form of computing (and yes, I do know IBM mainframes were virtualized in 
  1968), and many security tools haven't kept up. Add to that the fact that a 
  single virtualized server can act as dozens of machines. Compromise that server 
  and you can compromise the whole shooting match. 
 
More
	Posted by Doug Barney on October 09, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Last week, I 
wrote 
  about scareware
, those pesky pop-ups that claim your PC is infected. Click 
  the pop-up and you're either buying security or performance software you don't 
  need and doesn't even work, or your machine is now infected and ready to cash 
  it in. 
I've been getting plenty of horror stories -- you can check out a few of them 
  in 
 More
	
Posted by Doug Barney on October 09, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Scareware victims have been 
venting
 
  to us 
all 
  week
. Here are some more of your thoughts, including some praise for Vista's 
  scareware-fighting tactics:
   My own laptop became infected and I could not even turn my Office on! 
    I turned the machine off and prayed I would not have to format it. A colleague 
    sent me this 
    link and it worked well. I have not had a problem since running the malware 
    removal software.
    -Susan
  Regarding your scareware item, I am a system admin responsible for over 
    40 Vista machines. I've had Vista deployed since March 2007 with User Access 
    Control enabled. The users don't have administrator rights to their box. I 
    haven't had a single virus or malware incident reported by my users or by 
    Symantec AntiVirus.
   You tend to bad-mouth Vista in many of your articles, but you can put 
    me down as one admin that loves it because the users can't mess it up.
    -Ken
  Oddly enough, I can give some support to Vista on this one. After having 
    set up a computer that I was not concerned about, I decided to put Vista to 
    the test. I went to any number of search engines and started searching for 
    any site that I thought might give me a nasty bug. I finally found one. I 
    allowed the system to accept whatever was being offered despite Windows Defender 
    screaming at me not to do it. Yup, I was then infected. Symantec AV was helpless 
    against this new computer corrupter that I picked up and Vista sure hated 
    it, as well. Ended up just rebuilding the system.
   This along with another experience I had taught me one lesson: My system 
    is more secure with Windows Defender on and without Symantec AV than the other 
    way around (as you're not supposed to run AV with Defender on). To date, I 
    haven't seen anything to prove me wrong. Now, I'm sure there are others who 
    have had the opposite experience, and I'd like to hear from them. That way, 
    I'll know where not to go as well. The additional experience was that I ran 
    a test computer for around three months with Defender and no AV. I then installed 
    AV and ran a scan. No virus. Two weeks later I had a virus; my Defender was 
    turned off. But hey, maybe that's because I'm not using Forefront/Antigen, 
    right?
    -Jacob
  I wrote an article re-infecting a VM with a sample malware I obtained 
    from a client's machine, and documented all the corners of the VM that were 
    infected. See it here.
    -David
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on October 08, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Steve Ballmer defended himself, it seems, even more than his own company in 
  a class-action lawsuit over "Vista Capable" logos. Many consumers 
  are angry after buying a Vista Capable Computer (I call them VCCs) only to find 
  out it only ran lower-end versions of the OS. And sometimes, even that was a 
  stretch. 
Ballmer claims 
  he was out of the loop and not part of the logo decision. I believe him. 
  Heck, this guy is busier than Paris Hilton at an all-male revue! But Ballmer's 
  reasonable excuse doesn't excuse the misleading logo program itself. Consumers 
  and the fee-hungry lawyers (who'll get most of the award, anyway) are right 
  on this one.
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on October 08, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Public relations folks come in all shapes, sizes and levels of professionalism. 
  Sometimes, I get calls from a newbie clearly reading tech-speak from a script. 
  Other times, a trusted longtime pro calls me with information that's of 100 
  percent interest to my readers. Often, the level of creativity is less than 
  that of a Backstreet Boys song. 
Then there are the moments of true cleverness. I would've never written about 
  the company Secure 
  Computing this week were it not for PR spin-meister Richard Mulligan, who 
  told me that when it comes to spam, "Obama" beats "McCain" 
  by a factor of 6-to-1 (there's six times as much Obama-related spam as there 
  is about McCain), and that "Sarah Palin" slightly edged out "Joe 
  Biden" in the same category -- don't ya know!
 More
	Posted by Doug Barney on October 08, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    If you're one of the richest -- if not 
the
 richest -- men in the universe, 
  then a little thing like a near-stock market collapse isn't such a big deal. 
  Bill could lose $50 billion and still have enough to control Third World economies, 
  give Paris Hilton a clothing allowance and buy everyone in America a six-pack 
  of Pabst.
Even though Gates lives in a very different world, I trust his economic judgment. 
  (I try not to be political here, but does either major presidential candidate 
  understand anything about the economy or how to reduce our federal deficit? 
  You tell me at 
 More
	
Posted by Doug Barney on October 08, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Everyone, it seems, has a different way of passing their time in a hotel. Some 
  hit the town, many hit the restaurants, a lot hit the bars and more than a few 
  hit the pay-per-view. And some of us try to get some work done, and use the 
  wireless or Ethernet connections at $12.95 a day to connect to the home office. 
But like the food in the restaurants or some of the creeps in the bars, these 
  connections 
 More
	
Posted by Doug Barney on October 07, 20080 comments