Microsoft Sets Security Applications Free
So, OneCare is dead, but Microsoft's effort to be a security vendor is still
alive. Sort of. Microsoft will replace OneCare next year with a set of free
. Or maybe Microsoft will finally just take steps to
secure its own applications the way users have wanted it to for a long time.
In any case, there's the potential for trouble in all this.
The immediate reaction from many observers has been to suggest that Morro,
the code name for OneCare's free successor, will be lawsuit bait for Symantec
and McAfee -- you know, those companies that have made a living doing what
Microsoft wouldn't or couldn't to secure Windows -- and antitrust regulation
fodder for the ravenous European Union.
Redmond has already started the spin machine, suggesting that rivals' products
still be way better than Morro, which will just be a simple set of tools
for people who won't pay for anti-virus, anyway. Symantec and friends, whose
stock prices took a hit on the Morro news (not that they were alone in seeing
share prices fall this week), predictably played Morro as being no
And it probably isn't. First of all, Microsoft isn't going to introduce anything
that might even seem like a legitimate Symantec killer. There are lots of reasons
for this, but let's just confine ourselves for now to saying that Microsoft
likely won't want to throw another meaty bone to the EU regulation dogs.
Folks in Redmond have learned a lot from their various battles with government
regulators, and their attempts to slide in and take over markets aren't as blatant
as they used to be. Plus, Microsoft has a right -- a responsibility, really
-- to provide some level of basic security. And making it free actually seems
less monopolistic and more customer-friendly than making people pay for it.
But that leaves open, of course, greater questions: Where will Microsoft's
security efforts stop? And where should they stop? Symantec and McAfee, among
others, won't go away if Microsoft seriously decides to shore up its products
on its own; the big security vendors have huge businesses these days that go
way beyond making Windows work. So why shouldn't Microsoft improve built-in
security for its own application infrastructure? Most users would probably say
that it should -- and should have a long time ago.
That's not to say that Microsoft won't eventually try a more significant security
land grab -- there is, after all, a hosted
security suite on the way -- but for now, Morro seems pretty innocuous.
Whether rivals, regulators and the industry will see it that way is another
Posted by Lee Pender on November 20, 2008 at 11:54 AM