Exchange 2010 Not for Everyone
Some software upgrades are a piece of cake, some are so complex they're not worth it. Exchange 2010, for some, fits in that latter category. The good news and bad news is that Exchange 2010 is far different architecturally from its predecessors, particularly in how it stores files. That's how we make progress. One example is the new "database availability groups," which could take time and money to adapt to, according to a report from Forrester.
Exchange 2010 may also require upgraded third party tools such as security and backup.
Are you jones'in for this new software, or happy with what you've got? E-mail me through your messaging system of choice at firstname.lastname@example.org or post your comments below.
Posted by Doug Barney on February 05, 2010 at 11:53 AM