Everybody take a deep breath. One technology bellwether is reporting -- or
pre-reporting -- mostly good financial news. HP says that next week's earnings
report will
beat
Wall Street analysts' estimates.
Posted by Lee Pender on November 19, 20080 comments
Google Apps seems to be
making
headway with small businesses, but not as much headway as its open source
competitor,
OpenOffice.
Posted by Lee Pender on November 18, 20080 comments
Microsoft wants to be a player in Software-as-a-Service, or cloud computing,
or Web 2.0, or whatever the pundits are calling the off-premises, datacenter-hosted
enterprise computing model this week. So why does it feel as though Redmond
is dragging itself into this new model?
Take this week's launch
of Exchange Online and SharePoint Online for the cloud. In theory, this should
be simple. Customers sign up for hosted Exchange and SharePoint, pay a monthly
fee, open a browser and start working, right? Isn't that more or less what SaaS
is supposed to be? Well, not exactly. Check out this Microsoft quote from this
story:
"'I don't want to make it sound like someone signed onto the Web
site, swiped a credit card, and went home,' Chris Capossela, senior VP of
Microsoft's information worker product management group, said in an interview."
Uh...why not? Why doesn't it work that way? Granted, technology rarely works
exactly the way it promises to, but it seems to us that the point of SaaS is
to be low-cost (or, more specifically, have a predictable cost) and easy to
manage. Granted, SharePoint Online and Exchange Online probably accomplish that
to a greater extent than their traditional, on-premises parents do, but Exchange,
for example, still has a client component (Outlook, of course) installed on
PCs, and apparently there's some management to be done in-house with the SaaS
versions of both applications. (Partners, take note -- there's your in, if customers
buy into Microsoft as a SaaS company.)
Of course, we understand several things here: 1) These are complex products -- especially
SharePoint -- that do complex things, and it's perhaps a bit naïve to
think that companies will be able to just flick a switch and start using them.
2) Almost everybody who's investing in Online Services (the name of the combined
package) has some Microsoft infrastructure already and will have to integrate
the hosted with the on-premises.
But then there's 3) Microsoft likely doesn't want to totally cannibalize its
traditional SharePoint and Exchange businesses, so it's not going to make Online
Services too cheap or too easy to manage. In fact, in the case of SharePoint,
it's not even putting all of the features of traditional SharePoint into SharePoint
online -- not even all that
many of them, in fact.
All of this leads us to the conclusion that Software plus Services, Microsoft's
sort of proprietary name for SaaS, is really just Redmond's attempt to make
sure that companies still need to invest in some of the more money-spinning
parts of Microsoft's infrastructure. Microsoft has to have a SaaS offering --
and it's putting quite a bit of effort into this one, as well as into Azure
-- but don't expect any Salesforce.com-style, "No Software" marketing
lines coming out of Redmond any time soon. Online Services still doesn't represent
full-featured, 100-percent cloud applications. Will it ever? Can it ever? We
kind of hoped that we'd know by now...but we don't.
What's your take on Microsoft's SaaS vision? Are you looking for a more pure
SaaS play or does S+S make sense? Sound off at [email protected].
Posted by Lee Pender on November 18, 20080 comments
Remember the "Vista Capable" ("Incapable" would have been
more appropriate) lawsuit that dredged up a slew of
tasty
e-mails a few months back? Well, now there's more where that came from...and
this time
it's
HP that seems to get the short end of the stick from Redmond.
As we said months ago, we're sure that all of this is part of a pretty standard
sausage-making process for software...but all of this stuff sure is fun
to read.
Posted by Lee Pender on November 18, 20080 comments
Before we get started today, I'm going to drop the first-person plural because
I need to tell you that I messed something up, and it's kind of embarrassing.
Oh, it's not that big of a deal, really, but a couple of readers (Jeffrey and
Walt) noticed a boneheaded move in the first entry in
last
Thursday's RCPU. Walt sums it up well:
"Regarding your reference to depression-era billboards from the RCP
Update yesterday:
"'Still, though...ouch. These are the kinds of messages that bring
to mind depression-era
billboards that encouraged jobless men to not give up -- messages that
are encouraging but also pretty ominous. OK, granted, we don't think that
things will get anywhere near this bad, and we're not seriously suggesting
that there will be bread lines in Redmond or anywhere else any time soon.'
"I don't think that billboard is encouraging these jobless men to
not give up. If I read this correctly, this billboard is a warning to jobless
men traveling through town to keep on moving. The billboard says, 'Jobless
men keep going -- We can't take care of our own,' and it is signed, 'Chamber
of Commerce.' To me, this says, 'Don't even think of stopping in this town,
keep moving along -- if we catch you, we'll make sure you get the message'...It
also appears to be in a train yard, which means the jobless men probably rode
in on the rails..."
Walt, you are, of course, 100 percent correct. I had remembered seeing on
a documentary somewhere in the mists of time a few billboards from the Depression
encouraging unemployed men to keep their chins up, but the one I posted clearly
levied pretty much the opposite message: Get out of town; there's no work for
you here. Yeesh...I guess I missed that "We can't take care of our own"
written in fairly big letters at the bottom of the sign. OK, I feel stupid.
What I meant to post was something like this,
which was meant to serve as a pick-me-up but really (I'm guessing) ended up
coming off as ominous, if not a tad condescending. Anyway, thanks to Walt and
Jeffrey for actually paying attention to what they were reading in RCPU. As
for the rest of you: shame, shame, shame. Just kidding. But, seriously, I'm
sorry for the embarrassing mess-up, and I'll try to do better next time. (And
sorry for spending so much time on this, but as a history buff I feel the need
to overcorrect for this gaffe.)
Posted by Lee Pender on November 18, 20080 comments
Microsoft and HP are
making
a little news, and CA's CEO is providing the views, saying that management
will be the (we hate this expression)
"killer
app" for virtualization.
Posted by Lee Pender on November 18, 20080 comments
This week's
entry
about a Microsoft hosting deal with Telstra in Australia has a couple of our
antipodean readers buzzing. We chose to comment on this story because we figured
it would have some universal indicators for how SaaS is going to affect the
channel worldwide.
But for folks in Australia, the issue is immediate, and the responses were
passionate. (And for those of you not in Australia, which is probably most of
you, try to imagine how your fellow travelers in the channel are feeling because
you might end up feeling much the same way.) So, here we go. Let's start with
Ken -- who identifies himself as an IT manager -- in Melbourne (and, FYI, we've
Americanized the English for the home folks):
"Seems like a perfect marriage to me. With Microsoft and Telstra's
recent appalling track record and the sort of pathetic leadership shown by
both CEOs, most sensibly run businesses will only experience a short downturn
before their former customer base realizes how bad the service is, how expensive
the charge-out rate will be, how access to their own technology has vaporized
and how the decision to go with these turkeys was a bad move.
"When they figure that out and go crawling back to the old service providers,
don't be surprised if a new service deal costs 50 percent more. And yes we
are peeved -- thinking of going back to Novell."
Wow...there's not really a lot we can add to that, so we're not really going
to try. (We especially can't comment on Telstra, given that we know almost nothing
about the company.) But, Ken, thanks for letting us "take the temperature"
(in this case, boiling hot) of how folks in Australia feel about this deal.
Microsoft partners in Oz: If this is typical of the attitude you'll run into
from customers, you might want to think long and hard about your own SaaS strategy,
how you're going to pitch it and how Microsoft is going to fit into it.
We move on to David, also in Melbourne (Victoria represents!), who is a partner,
and who says that companies should have seen this deal coming and should be
able to react to it:
"The Telstra-Microsoft deal is typical of what we can all expect
as cloud computing kicks off. My response was to register Cloudintegrators.com
and get on with looking at how we can build total business solutions for the
SME sector so we can set them free from traditional infrastructure and have
them integrate multiple cloud-based solutions for their business platform.
"The mistake Microsoft may have made on this deal is that SMEs in
Australia hate Telstra with a passion and only use their services because
there is no other total telephony solution provider in Australia. While Telstra
holds an effective monopoly on our phone and data solutions, we would not
choose to do IT business with them so long as there is a choice.
"This deal is not an end-game yet. Opportunities still exist en masse
in the SaaS space in Australia and globally. Oh, and if all one can do is
traditional IT infrastructure, one has at least six months to retrain, so
start reading now."
That's good advice there at the end, David -- words that every partner around
the globe should heed. It's time to adapt; although there's no reason to panic,
it's worth figuring out, partners, how you're going to adapt your business model
to SaaS. Dave seems to be on the right path there. By the way, not for nothing,
David also told us that his company became a Salesforce.com Registered Consulting
Partner in August and called that move the "biggest step forward [the company]
has taken since becoming a Microsoft Gold Certified Partner."
And then there was Brad, who sent what is possibly your editor's favorite e-mail
of the year so far. Brad's a fellow native Texan who, like your editor, sympathized
with the poor folks of Australia who constantly have to de-bunk myths about
their homeland and put up with lame jokes. Brad says:
"I am also a native Texan, and living in California provides a lot
of opportunity for local natives to brutalize my home state (and me in the
process). But after 18 years of being out here it is easier to handle. I found
when I was in Australia that it was a lot like Texas -- so I had a great time."
We feel you on this one, Brad. From the brim of our Stetson to the tips of
our cowboy boots...where did that "rolling eyes" emoticon go, anyway?
(And, in case you were wondering, neither Brad nor your editor rode a horse
to school as a kid, and neither of us grew up with oil wells in the front yard.)
Thanks to all who have e-mailed RCPU recently. We have tons of great stuff
that we haven't run yet, but we're going to try to get to it in the weeks to
come. In the meantime, keep your thoughts on any and all topics coming in to
[email protected].
Posted by Lee Pender on November 13, 20080 comments
WEBS and SBS 2008 -- much ballyhooed, and, yes, we're using that word a lot
this week -- are
finally
out, just in time for the nasty part of the recession.
Posted by Lee Pender on November 13, 20080 comments
Don't freak out or anything, but we don't remember seeing anything
like this coming from Redmond before -- at least not recently. Partner Program
Chief Allison Watson sent an e-mail to Program members this morning, giving
them tips on how to sell in a bad economy and filling them in a bit on the new
Azure platform.
It's a very upbeat
and totally pragmatic message, and it's totally appropriate and welcome
at a time like this. This is Microsoft and the Partner Program demonstrating
leadership at a time when partners need it -- and that's exactly the kind
of thing the channel should welcome, especially during an economic downturn.
Still, though...ouch. These are the kinds of messages that bring to mind depression-era
billboards that encouraged jobless men to not give up -- messages that are
encouraging but also pretty ominous. OK, granted, we don't think that things
will get anywhere near this
bad, and we're not seriously suggesting that there will be bread lines in
Redmond or anywhere else any time soon.
Microsoft is still a monster financially, and most partners are and will be,
we're guessing, profitable right through the current recession and into
a recovery. But growth could and likely will flatten out, or even shrink (in
which case it wouldn't be growth at all...), and it seems highly unlikely
right now that 2009 will be as kind to most companies as 2008 was. And 2008
was pretty brutal compared to, say, 2003-2006. Whispers of potential double-digit
unemployment and a recession that could deepen in the quarters to come are not
encouraging.
Although technology in general seems to be getting a glancing blow from the
storm that's brought down huge names on Wall Street and is threatening to sink
GM(!) and others, a few tech companies are starting to show vulnerability. Cisco
issued
a revenue warning with its last earnings statement, and Microsoft's Dynamics
numbers -- remember, Dynamics is business software and therefore provides some
barometer as to how much companies are spending on enterprise technology right
now -- have cratered recently. RCP Editor in Chief Scott Bekker lays
out some of the damage:
"In the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, the growth in Microsoft Dynamics
customer billings fell off a cliff. They were at a 10 percent increase compared
to 18 percent the year before and 19 percent the year before that. This at
a time when the rest of the sales in the Microsoft Business Division, which
is primarily Microsoft Office, were growing at 20 percent -- consistent with
the previous year. Microsoft shook up the Dynamics field organization in the
United States to help fix it."
Now, maybe that's just Dynamics struggling -- or, more specifically, growing
at a slower rate than it has been -- but we suspect that what's happening with
Dynamics is not an isolated case. (Microsoft, by the way, has responded by offering
a 0
percent financing deal on Dynamics applications.)
Not that partners don't know all of this, of course. This downturn has rolled
in like a slow-moving hurricane rather than like a flash flood. Everybody's
getting ready for it -- even Microsoft, which wants its partners to be prepared.
Still, Watson's message, while appropriate, isn't exactly a sign that Redmond
expects things to get better any time soon.
How long do you think it'll take the economy to turn around? How bad are you
preparing for things to get? Tell us at [email protected].
Posted by Lee Pender on November 13, 20081 comments
It's a new storage deal for the monster distributor.
Here's
the press release.
Posted by Lee Pender on November 13, 20082 comments
OK, so the
news
isn't great...but it could be much, much worse.
Posted by Lee Pender on November 13, 20080 comments
Ever heard of Searete LLC? How about Intellectual Ventures? The company names
might be unfamiliar, but chances are you've heard of the people (
like
Bill Gates, for instance) behind these patent-seeking firms.
Posted by Lee Pender on November 12, 20087 comments