One of the Directions on Microsoft guys 
thinks 
  it's possible, and they're not often wrong about the goings on in Redmond. 
  So, Vista inches ever closer to the scrap heap of history...with poor (OK, not 
  that poor, given his contract) Jerry Seinfeld in tow. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 16, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Well, presumably Mark Conley's parents actually named him...but CommVault has 
  
hired Conley as 
  director of North American channel sales.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 11, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Oh, how the proprietary have fallen. Well, not fallen really, but certainly 
  changed. Microsoft is making noises about openness and collaboration again, 
  this time with a couple of standards-oriented initiatives. 
Redmond said this week that it'll work on a Web services interface with IBM 
  and EMC, and it's also joining a standards group called the Object Management 
  Group. (OK, so we didn't know what that was, either -- but this 
  story told us).
Of course, there will always be healthy and probably justified skepticism about 
  just how open Microsoft wants to be and what its true motives are for joining 
  these efforts (as in, to take them over completely). But we can't fault Redmond 
  for at least showing signs of coming out of its proprietary shell. And if this 
  new spirit of glasnost actually leads to technological advancements of 
  some sort -- hey, all the better! 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 11, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Well, that's what 
the 
  headline says, although we wonder how much one has to do with the other. 
  And, at 0.7 percent market share, Chrome seems like much less of a threat to 
  IE than Firefox -- for now. But, hey, we all love to read about Google, right?
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 10, 20086 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Given the hysteria in this part of the world over Tom Brady's knee, we barely 
  noticed that the London Stock Exchange crashed yesterday. Yes, that's right; 
  the news is shocking -- Tom Brady's out for the season. 
No, wait, that's not the news we meant to talk about. What we meant to say 
  was: Yes, that's right; the news is shocking -- the 
  London freaking Stock Exchange went down. For almost an entire day. During 
  a rally. 
It might not have the massive impact of Brady's injury, but a whole major stock 
  exchange going down for a day sounds like a pretty big deal here at RCPU. What's 
  an even bigger deal, you ask? The fact that some people are blaming 
  Microsoft for the crash. 
Ugh. OK, so maybe it's not fair to blame Microsoft and .NET for the LSE's meltdown. 
  We really don't know. Right now, probably nobody does. But this is one of those 
  black eyes that Microsoft -- which had advertised the fact that the LSE picked 
  its wares over Linux for "reliability" -- just doesn't need. 
Maybe this little mini-storm will pass -- or maybe Microsoft really will 
  end up being officially at fault somehow, in which case partners might have 
  to field a few questions about just how reliable Redmond's infrastructure is. 
  Is this a few strained ligaments or a torn ACL for Redmond? We'll see -- but 
  Microsoft folks have to hope that they'll make out better than Tom Brady. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 10, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    So, this week, Microsoft held one of those non-event events in which it gathers 
  reporters together to release a few details about upcoming products, and reporters 
  go because, well, it's Microsoft.
OK, so it wasn't 
  a total non-event, but we do kind of wonder sometimes why Microsoft bothers 
  with a whole big press event when a press release and a couple of spokespeople 
  available to take calls would 
  suffice. 
But that's all press stuff, and you don't care about press stuff. You care 
  about what Microsoft had to say earlier this week. Basically, with regard to 
  its virtualization plans, Redmond says that things are coming along. The Hyper-V 
  hypervisor is free now, as opposed to costing $28, and Redmond's working on 
  what it calls Live Migration -- "the ability to move a virtual machine 
  (VM) from one physical machine to another, with no downtime," as Virtualization 
  Review Editor Keith Ward so 
  eloquently writes.
There's a whole lineup of products either coming or on the way, and the attention 
  Microsoft is paying to virtualization signals that the technology will be a 
  cornerstone of its strategic plans going forward. And that has to be good news 
  given that the company won't be able to rely on the earning power of Windows 
  and Office forever. Besides, we could use a good rivalry in the industry these 
  days, and Microsoft-VMware could be a healthy battle -- an event not to be 
  missed. 
What's your take on Microsoft's virtualization strategy? Send it to [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 09, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Love it or hate it -- and, let's face it, you probably hated it the way we 
  did -- Microsoft's bizarre 
Bill 
  Gates-Jerry Seinfield-shoe shopping ad at least has the blogs burning with 
  opinions, even if 
most 
  of them are negative. 
We understand that the ad campaign is a series, but the next installment is 
  going to have to do a lot of explaining and a heck of a lot more entertaining 
  to hold our interest.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 09, 20081 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    From the cloud comes a cool, refreshing 
rain 
  of updates for Microsoft's hosted CRM service.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 09, 20080 comments