The company that just loves to buy 
snapped 
  up a maker of project-management software this week. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 09, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    This 
  looks primarily like a European play (or Europlay, we suppose) for Symantec. 
  The purchase price came out to $695 million, or approximately 35 Euros plus 
  change. (Just kidding -- we hope.) 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 09, 20081 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Whatever UC 
actually 
  is, everybody wants to be a part of it. And everybody, especially Microsoft, 
  wants to offer Software as a Service, too. Microsoft and a company called BroadSoft 
  teamed up this week to combine the two hottest areas (along with virtualization, 
  but that's another topic altogether) in technology, announcing a 
joint 
  SaaS UC effort. 
Now maybe somebody can figure out exactly what UC is and why companies should 
  invest in a hosted version of it.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 09, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    One of the more entertaining scenarios in the recent history of Microsoft, 
  the infamous 
Vista 
  Capable lawsuit, has led to a semi-comical deposition from Steve Ballmer, 
  who 
pretty 
  much denies ever having heard of Vista. 
OK, he didn't go that far, but let's just say that baldness isn't all that 
  he and Sgt. Schultz 
  have in common. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 08, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    It's the story that never goes away -- although lots of people wish the operating 
  system would. Vista is back in the news, or, more specifically, XP is back. 
  The beloved operating system got 
another 
  stay of execution this week, as Microsoft essentially announced that it 
  would allow OEMs to "downgrade" users to XP for six months longer 
  than planned. 
As for the "other" OS, Vista, it's hard to say what its future holds. 
  XP's expiration date (or should that be XPiration date?) could come dangerously 
  close to flirting with the launch of Windows 7, a signal that, perhaps, 
  Microsoft really is ready to let Vista stumble out into the cold and die by 
  the side of the road -- a fate many users would still consider too good for 
  the troubled OS.
It's worth noting here that Volume Licensing customers get downgrade rights 
  regardless of what's happening with OEM downgrades -- an oft-misunderstood detail 
  that Microsoft's PR firm was careful to point out in relation to a recent 
  Redmond magazine story. So XP's lifeline will mostly apply to consumers 
  and small businesses, but it's still a sign to partners that Microsoft isn't 
  likely to stop supporting the trusted old OS any time soon.
All of which reinforces a notion that's becoming clearer and clearer: Windows 
  7 had better be pretty good. With Vista turning users away in fairly large numbers 
  and Software as a Service making the OS itself a little more obsolete by the 
  day, Windows 7 will step into a harsh reality when it does finally come out. 
  In the meantime, if you're in the market for a computer, you might want to consider 
  buying one by the end of July 2009. That's when Microsoft's supposedly going 
  to cut off supplies of XP. Supposedly...but we'll believe it when we see it.
We're always open to a good round of Vista bashing as well as some Vista praise. 
  Send your thoughts to [email protected]. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 08, 20081 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    AMD won't be fab -- or, more precisely, 
have 
  fabs -- much longer.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 08, 20081 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    This just makes a lot of sense if you think about it, or even if you don't. 
  Why let a bunch of other vendors make a bundle on business intelligence applications 
  that are mainly centered on your database when you can 
build 
  the stuff in yourself?
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 08, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    OK, we get the point here. Microsoft is saying that using pirated software 
  could 
lead 
  to huge problems -- of the technical, and not just legal, kind. 
But the deck of this story made us chuckle a little bit: "Company-sponsored 
  report says counterfeits lead to system failures, lost data." Wait, doesn't 
  using a legitimate copy of Windows lead to that stuff?
Oh, come on, it's only a joke. Lighten up and enjoy the rest of the week. We'll 
  be back on Tuesday. Be sure to tip your waitress...
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 02, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    The launch was kind of, sort of last month, but the product's out there today. 
  Go figure. Anyway, 
here's 
  the press release. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 02, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    It's so hard letting go. All the money, all the memories, all the good times -- it's 
  hard to think of them as things of the past. Just look at Microsoft. Cloud computing 
  is here, and the old operating system and productivity suite are becoming less 
  and less relevant all the time. But Microsoft just can't let them go. 
OK, most of that last sentence was a massive overstatement -- but we got 
  your attention, right? We know that Windows isn't going to be obsolete any time 
  soon, if ever. And Office is likely to be the suite of choice for the masses 
  for at least a few more years to come. 
Plus, there's no guarantee that SaaS, cloud computing or whatever you want 
  to call it will ever unseat the old-fashioned desktop computing model, much 
  less bump it off within the next few years. (After all, ASPs never ruled the 
  world, and they were really just early SaaS providers.)
Still, SaaS is looking more like a viable alternative every day, and companies 
  like Google, NetSuite and especially Salesforce.com are building nice little 
  (actually, pretty darn big) businesses around it. So we're intrigued by some 
  of the comments 
  Steve Ballmer made this week when he dropped a few hints about a forthcoming 
  "Windows Cloud" OS that will be aimed at developers of SaaS applications. 
Never mind, first off, that some 
  startup seems to have beaten Microsoft to the Windows 
  Cloud punch. What we're interested in is Ballmer's attitude toward SaaS 
  -- or Software Plus Services, as Microsoft calls it -- more than the scant details 
  the Microsoft CEO released on Windows Cloud.
Let's check some quotes from the PC World article linked above: 
  "Ballmer was quick to point out that Microsoft doesn't envision products 
    such as the Office productivity suite to move entirely off desktop PCs and 
    onto the Internet.
  But Microsoft is working on a service that would let people do 'light 
    editing' of Office documents at places such as a public Internet kiosk, Ballmer 
    said."
Ballmer doesn't envision Office moving entirely onto the Internet? At all? 
  Ever? Why not? We're not saying that a SaaS-model Office would outsell the traditional 
  offering. But as cloud computing gains acceptance, why wouldn't Microsoft at 
  least offer a hosted option for Office? Would it cannibalize desktop revenues 
  that much? Is the model just too difficult to put into action, and too risky 
  financially?
If so, then Microsoft really might be in trouble. Again, we're not flying a 
  flag for a SaaS revolution here, but we do acknowledge -- who doesn't? -- that 
  it's an attractive model for customers and partners alike who know what they're 
  doing. It's growing now and seems likely to continue growing, and, unlike the 
  ASPs of the '90s, companies such as Salesforce.com seem to have the confidence 
  of small-business and maybe even some enterprise customers. 
In a tightening economy, with midsize companies increasingly looking to save 
  costs and dump off IT management on somebody else, Ballmer is talking about 
  Office being on the desktop for at least the foreseeable future. And, in doing 
  so, he's kind of dismissing cloud computing (more on that shortly). Those are 
  worrying signs because they seem to point to Microsoft being either unable or 
  unwilling technically and financially to fully embrace the increasingly popular 
  cloud computing model with its core products. 
And then there was this:
  "Ballmer was dismissive of Google, saying Docs and Spreadsheets has 
    'relatively low usage' and that users want richer features in an office software 
    package.
  'We want software more powerful than software that runs in a browser,' 
    Ballmer said."
Whoa. OK, he's right about the first part. Google Docs and Spreadsheets is 
  a pretty weak offering thus far, both in terms of functionality (compared to 
  Office, anyway) and in terms of market share. But the second part of the quote 
  above is the kicker. If Ballmer's just talking about Office being more powerful 
  than Google's apps, fine. But -- and this could come down to how the reporter 
  wrote the story, we'll admit -- it sounds as though he's suggesting that cloud 
  applications aren't as powerful as their on-premises cousins. 
Salesforce.com, its users and partners will likely beg to disagree. And if 
  Microsoft's attitude is that desktop apps will always trump SaaS offerings in 
  terms of functionality, there would seem to be a serious lack of vision in Redmond. 
  Surely that's not the case...right? 
We'd like to think that Microsoft is moving toward fully embracing cloud computing 
  and bringing partners along for the ride. And, to be fair, there have been lots 
  of signals to that effect. But Ballmer's comments seem to be those of a 
  CEO who doesn't want to see the old-school OS and desktop productivity suite 
  -- his company's moneymakers -- become less and less relevant all the time. 
  We know it's hard letting go -- but everybody, even Microsoft, has got to move 
  forward. 
Does Microsoft get cloud computing? Let us know at [email protected]. 
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 02, 20080 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Somewhere between helping companies more easily retrieve long-buried data and 
  seeing its vendors get snapped up by tech giants, business intelligence (BI) 
  technology got expensive...and complicated. Kalido and its partners are out 
  to take BI back, in part by moving it online.
"It's been very difficult for companies to get enterprise-wide adoption 
  of BI tools because the infrastructure required to support them is very heavy," 
  said Bill Hewitt, Kalido president and CEO, in a phone chat with RCPU this week. 
  Hewitt was referring specifically to business intelligence applications from 
  Business Objects and Cognos, the two main market players, which were recently 
  snapped up by software titans SAP 
  and IBM, 
  respectively. 
"The cost of implementing Business Objects and Cognos is cost-prohibitive. 
  SAP and IBM make it clear that you need to buy their apps," Hewitt said.
Even before the mega-vendors picked the BI market nearly clean, BI technology 
  -- which basically lets companies easily find and manipulate critical business 
  information from multiple sources, especially databases -- had become too big 
  and expensive for mid-market companies. Apps that were meant to simplify life 
  suddenly had implementation schedules that ran for months (or years) and costs 
  with a lot of zeroes before the decimal point. 
So Kalido is stepping in with an offering intended for mid-size companies -- 
  and hosted and managed by partners. It's BI in the cloud, with a monthly subscription 
  fee and outsourced management for customers rather than a huge start-up cost 
  and an overworked IT staff. Oh, and that means a recurring revenue stream from 
  subscriptions for partners. Kalido's offering starts at $5,000 per month priced 
  to the reseller -- which can then charge as it sees fit for management and services. 
"We take the data from the source system to the BI tool with a business-driven, 
  fully automated engine," Hewitt said. "There's no manual coding. The 
  result is far fewer people are needed to maintain the environment. If you take 
  BO and Cognos as the best examples, they are the traditional BI stack. Those 
  products need to be integrated by the customer. Customers need to know infrastructure 
  pieces for SAP and IBM. You can get infrastructure up and running in 90 days 
  with our approach."
Kalido's partner-hosted offering will actually integrate with both BO and Cognos 
  apps -- or it'll work with Microsoft Excel, which Hewitt called "the most 
  popular reporting tool on the planet." It also simplifies reports -- one 
  company moved from using 5,000 reports to using just 1,800. The key, Hewitt 
  said, is to take the burden of BI management off of IT people and create a more 
  useful business context for the technology -- putting control over reporting 
  in the hands of users rather than in the hands of IT folks. 
"They manage the environment, but IT people don't understand a context 
  of the way info is used," he said. "When business users take accountability 
  for what they want to see, they end up getting what they want."
There's more about Kalido's hosted offering here. 
This was just one of those technology offerings we found interesting enough 
  to feature in RCPU. If you've got something you think is cool, unique or especially 
  useful, feel free to drop us a line at [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 01, 20081 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    What we like about this company is...well, it's based in Biarritz. That's 
the 
  Biarritz, as in the seaside resort in the southwest of France. Mmm, Biarritz. 
  Anyway, 
here's 
  the PDF of the press release.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on October 01, 20080 comments