Get it? Rolls out? It's a pun wrapped in a word play.  Anyway, the question here isn't how good 
Microsoft's car software is, but whether there will be an auto industry in the next few months to actually buy  it.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on March 03, 20090 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    OK, we're not going to lie to you. (We never do lie to you,  actually, but in this case we're going to be ridiculously truthful.) Your  editor just spent a decent chunk of Monday afternoon shoveling snow, uncovering  cars and watching the neighbor clear the driveway with the second-greatest  invention of all time, the snow blower. (The greatest invention is still air  conditioning.)
So this might not be the most poignant, clever or analytical  RCPU entry of all time. But it will be informative, starting with this week's  news, lovingly crafted by RCP Editor  in Chief Scott Bekker, that Microsoft is taking its online services worldwide. 
Yes, these are the "Software plus Services"  offerings that partners either freaked out about  or loved  at the Worldwide Partner Conference last summer. Now we'll get to hear  complaining or praise in multiple languages from 19 mostly European countries,  some of which are actually snowier than New England  in the winter. We just hope that those who need them have snow blowers. The  front steps were enough of a backache.
What's your take on Microsoft's S+S plan for partners? How  long and dreary has this winter been for you? Comment, complain or gloat at [email protected].   
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on March 03, 20090 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Microsoft is suing the Linux-loving GPS company, and since  patents are involved in the suit, the open source community is 
getting nervous.  And probably for good reason.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on March 03, 20090 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    If we were hosting a '70s variety show or possibly "Saturday  Night Live," we'd be smiling, pointing and saying, "Once again, ladies and  gentlemen, Scott Bekker!" And here he is with details of 
changes to Citrix's  partner program.  Followed by a song, we hope.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on March 03, 20090 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    It makes sense if you think about it. It might even make  sense if you don't. That's why we're prone to believe the rumor that Windows 7  could arrive as early as September. 
This week, an executive at an OEM in Taipei dropped the mega-hint that the final  version Windows 7 might not wait until December or January to come bursting out  of the womb.  Ray Chen of Compal Electronics is talking about Microsoft releasing the  magnificent 7 this fall, maybe in September or October. 
There are a lot of reasons that this could be true. First of  all, OEMs usually know about this stuff before anybody else does for reasons we  hope are obvious. Second, as Redmond  magazine details in its March cover story, Windows 7 already looks very stable  and impressive in beta form,  although we're also careful to note that not everybody is raving about the  forthcoming OS. 
Beyond all that, getting users' minds off of Vista seems to  be a priority for Microsoft (although Redmond still tows the questionably  credible line that it's better to "upgrade" to Vista before moving to  7) and there's no better way to do that than to release a brand-new, whiz-bang OS  ahead of schedule. Plus, a September release would get Windows 7 into consumers'  hands by the all-important holiday shopping season, which might help give a  kick-start to what's expected to be a sluggish PC market this year. 
Of course, for enterprise partners, timing isn't everything.  Chances are that clients aren't moving to Vista,  and companies likely won't go rushing out to implement Windows 7 the day it  hits the shelves. Besides, it's consulting and integration revenue that really  matters, not so much OS sales, which are mostly tied to purchases of new PCs. 
Still, Microsoft's financial health does matter to partners  because more revenue means more investment in products and in the Partner  Program. And Redmond,  like many companies in the industry, could use a little jolt right now. What's  more, it wouldn't hurt Microsoft to smooth over some of the rough feelings it  caused with the debacle that was Vista. A  successful Windows 7 released early could have a feel-good effect among  customers, which could trickle down into revenues for partners. 
Of course, this is all just the product of a rumor, but it's  a rumor that we're inclined -- and would like -- to believe. Stay tuned.
How excited would you be by a September release of Windows  7? Have your say at [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on February 26, 20092 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    HP is distributing Solaris 10 
on Proliant servers and  blades; the two companies seem to be aiming the effort squarely at both  Microsoft and Linux.  Good luck.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on February 26, 20090 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Hmm. Maybe there's something to the idea that a down economy will be a boon to companies that offer a hosted model. Salesforce.com bucked the industry -- and the global -- trend by blowing its earnings out of the water in its most recent fiscal quarter.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on February 26, 20090 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
            
                
                
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Bull, Dell and HP  are some of the big partners involved with 
this effort.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on February 25, 20090 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    In the same week in  which VMware 
started releasing parts of its Virtual Data Center Operating  System  (which 
Redmond magazine was 
all over  back in December),  Red Hat also threw its, um, hat into the virtualization ring. Keith Ward has that story with a much better hat  reference 
here. 
And if you're  curious about VMware's overall strategy, be sure to check out Chris Wolf's take  on RCPmag.com's sister site, VirtualizationReview.com.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on February 25, 20090 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    
  "Dance with the one what brung ya."
    -- Old Texas saying often  used by, and possibly even coined by, Darrell Royal, former football coach at  the University of   Texas
We hope that your editor's fellow TCU Horned Frogs out  there -- we know you're reading -- will forgive a quote from an old rival, but we  just couldn't think of a better quip to describe Steve Ballmer's state-of-Microsoft  speech delivered on Wall Street this week.
As Redmond magazine columnist and long-time friend of RCPU Mary Jo Foley explains,  Ballmer laid out Microsoft's product-investment priorities for the year, and he  mostly avoided dwelling on the stuff that produces groans and eye rolls from  our little corner of the peanut gallery. (RCPmag.com's Kurt   Mackie gives a great breakdown of the actual investment  numbers plus some additional analysis here.) 
Mary Jo lays out Ballmer's seven areas of focus in a blog  entry -- we've removed her lengthy and helpful analysis for the purpose of  brevity:
  "1. Windows 
    2. Mobile 
    3. Desktop  productivity (as in Office, SharePoint and even Dynamics)
    4. Server and tools 
    5. Enterprise software (as in SQL Server)
    6. Search and  advertising 
    7. Entertainment and  TV"
We like that list,  and especially the order of it. Knock mobile down a few notches, and it would  be just about perfect. Hack the last two categories off altogether, and it  might look even better. But we digress. It wasn't all that long ago that  Ballmer was making noises about turning Microsoft into an ad agency, or at  least coming close to it. Now, though, the  austerity required to survive a recession seems to have brought Microsoft back  to its roots: the software and tools that have made the company the titan it is  today. We've said before (and more than once)  that these bad times might be a good time for Microsoft to de-emphasize some of  its more fanciful projects, such as trying to catch Google in consumer search  or trying to create the next iPod, and get back to the basics that have made  the company and its partners so successful over the years. 
Apparently, Ballmer  is starting to see things our way -- hello, Steve, if you're out there -- and while  Microsoft isn't giving up the ghost on going after Google, the company does  seem to have its priorities in order. Microsoft's core product  portfolio -- Windows, Office, servers, the enterprise stuff -- might be the strongest  in the industry, and it's going to be that portfolio that'll carry Microsoft  and its channel through the rough economic times to come that Ballmer keeps  predicting.   
And maybe, if and when  the economic sun does shine again and we can all check our portfolios without  cringing, Redmond  will remember this downturn and continue to focus on the bread-and-butter  products that got it where it is today rather than chasing after other dance  partners. The one what brung Microsoft still looks pretty darn good.
Where would you like  to see Microsoft invest its money in 2009? Sound off at [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on February 25, 20091 comments