Channel 
  monster CDW is back with more numbers for your consumption. This time, the 
  Large Account Reseller is looking at adoption of Vista and Office 2007. The 
  crux of the findings is that Vista -- which almost 30 percent of "IT decision 
  makers" are either using or "evaluating" -- seems to be a good 
  springboard to adoption of Office 2007. While not particularly surprising, that 
  little nugget still seems interesting. From the 
press 
  release:
  "The survey of 753 IT decision makers, released last May, indicated 
    that 29 percent of respondents were currently using or evaluating Windows 
    Vista. Newly released findings of the survey show that 42 percent of those 
    using or evaluating Windows Vista have deployed or plan to deploy the 2007 
    Microsoft Office system, and that 38 percent said they planned to do so within 
    12 months of when they took the survey last February."
So there you go. Hopefully, you're one of the partners who's profiting from 
  the uptake (and we won't comment on the speed of the uptake, having said enough 
  already) of these technologies.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 07, 20070 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    There was a time, of course, when Microsoft couldn't do without vendors like 
  Symantec (and maybe it still can't -- but that remains to be seen). Big security 
  players were the cops who kept Windows from looking like some dark, dangerous, 
  back-alley operating system and held most -- if definitely not all -- of the 
  attacks that threatened various versions of the OS at bay. Windows needed security, 
  and Symantec and friends happily -- and profitably -- provided it. And they 
  still do. 
But if there are three things that are inevitable in life, they are these: 
  death, taxes and Microsoft invading its partners' markets. It's Symantec's turn 
  now, as Redmond has launched its Forefront suite in an attempt to unseat the 
  leader in enterprise endpoint security. From now on, these old friends will 
  also be rivals, taking up arms like two great empires preparing for battle -- 
  while still collaborating to stave off threats to Windows. 
Partners, of course, are caught in the middle of this impending war -- and 
  profitably so, if they play both sides well enough. In this 
  month's RCP, we use plenty of historical allusions to describe the 
  battle 
  between Microsoft and Symantec and how it will affect both companies' partners.
And here's a little teaser to get you to click 
  the link -- an excerpt from an exclusive interview with Symantec CEO John 
  Thompson, who weaves a subtle tapestry of words in his description of Forefront 
  (just in case you doubted the presence of rancor in this new-world relationship):
  "When the hype settles down, people have to settle into the pragmatic 
    reality, which is that [Microsoft's] product sucks." 
Oh, it's on now! 
What's your take on Microsoft Forefront and Symantec? Sound off at [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 07, 20071 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    Maybe you're not entirely sure what Software as a Service is. Sure, you read 
  a lot about it (even here), and maybe you hear people talking about it. You 
  see that Salesforce.com seems to be cleaning up revenue-wise with it. Perhaps 
  your customers have even puzzled you by inquiring as to what your SaaS option 
  is. So you're left trying to figure out what SaaS really is, much less what 
  your strategy for it should be. 
Then along comes Microsoft, as only Microsoft can, changing the vocabulary 
  altogether. It's not SaaS that Microsoft is pushing, after all; it's S+S, or 
  Software Plus Services. Great -- another buzzword to learn and explain, another 
  strategy to develop. 
Well, if all you know about SaaS is that it sounds like a word your mother 
  would have used when you talked back to her as a kid, take heart. RCP 
  is here to help. And not only are we talking SaaS in our September 
  issue, we're also clarifying exactly what 
  Microsoft means by S+S -- and how partners can benefit from it.
Executive Editor Anne Stuart has the lowdown on Microsoft's vision for a hosted-technology 
  model, and if this little passage doesn't hook you to click 
  the link, you might as well close up shop now:
  "While Microsoft officials talked nonstop about how the transition 
    to SaaS would revolutionize its business, the company's overall approach was 
    heavy on vision, light on details. Until Denver. Microsoft's leaders used 
    the fourth annual Worldwide Partner Conference to share, for the first time, 
    some specifics about what they call 'Software Plus Services' (or S+S). The 
    first came in the form of a warning: Climb aboard the Good Ship S+S -- or 
    risk being left behind on the dock."
Unless you're quite happy on the dock -- and we suspect that you wouldn't be 
  for long -- you'll want to dig in to our September feature.
What's your SaaS strategy? Do you have one? Are you developing one, and how? 
  What's your take on S+S? Answer any, all or none of those questions at [email protected].
And, on a completely different note but while we have your attention (hopefully), 
  we're also hoping to hear from partners who are involved in infrastructure optimization. 
  Send comments on that to [email protected], 
  too.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 06, 20070 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    OK, so it's not the greatest play on words of all time, but we were trying 
  to go for something other than a "turns on Silverlight" phrase (which 
  Keith Ward already stole), which kind of makes us think of a lousy old Neil 
  Diamond song. 
Anyway, Microsoft released 
  Silverlight this week.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 06, 20070 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    And that's 
a 
  big "no" from a big standards organization for Microsoft's Office 
  Open XML document format.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 04, 20070 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    With apologies to our friends outside the U.S. who were probably working yesterday, 
  we're still recovering from a long holiday weekend here and all the work we 
  missed on Monday. So, get ready for some quick hits today. (Yes, that means 
  you get a break from RCPU's usual ponderings, but we'll be back to ponder tomorrow.) 
  Also, we'll have a Friday edition this week, so be on the lookout for that.
In the meantime, as the grill cools and the kids whine about going back to 
  school, have a gander at Keith 
  Ward's excellent story on why, exactly, Windows Server 2008 is delayed again. 
And, remember, always feel free to comment on any entry you see here at [email protected]. 
  And enjoy those Labor Day leftovers, if there are any.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on September 04, 20070 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
            
                
                
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    If 
this 
  stuff works, it could spell doom for the makers of Skittles and Mountain 
  Dew.
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on August 29, 20070 comments
          
	
 
            
                
                
 
    
    
	
    We hear the phrase all the time -- "SMB," or small and medium-sized 
  businesses. Partners, vendors and analysts all say that the new pot of revenue 
  gold lies at the end of the SMB rainbow, now that bigger companies have just 
  about all the technology they can stand, thank you very much. But SMB is not 
  a homogenous category of enterprises. Indeed, some Bs are considerably more 
  M than S, and vice versa.
With that stratification in mind, channel heavyweight CDW recently completed 
  a study on how small businesses grow to be medium-sized (meaning, for the purposes 
  of this study, shops of 100 employees or more), and how much focus they put 
  on IT in the growth process. The study provides some insight into small-business 
  survival skills, given that only half of all startup businesses survive their 
  first four years. The survey results could also prove to be instructive for 
  partners setting their vessels out into the ocean of SMBs. 
You can see the full study here 
  if you fill out a short request form (pretty much name and e-mail). It's worth 
  a look, as it reveals a few trends partners might like to mention when they 
  call on clients and a few strategies channel players can use to close deals.
First off, CDW found that in successful startups -- in a cross-section of industries, 
  not just in technology -- IT is a big deal for business owners. Of the companies 
  surveyed that went from startups to more than 100 employees, 74 percent of owners 
  said that they were "totally involved in IT decisions"; 42 percent 
  of them said that they handled IT themselves, with no dedicated IT department 
  -- although those that did have a dedicated IT person or department were likely 
  to grow more quickly than those that didn't. Fully 65 percent of business owners 
  agreed or strongly agreed that their IT strategies were critical in their companies 
  growing beyond 100 employees.
A hearty 22 percent of bosses went as far as to identify themselves as "total 
  geeks"...and saw their companies grow, for the most part, faster than those 
  whose owners were less interested in IT. 
"One of the most compelling findings is that IT literacy is a strong factor 
  [for growth]," Lauren McCadney, senior segment manager for small business 
  at CDW, tells RCPU. "We asked people to self-identify. Those folks who 
  self-identify as IT geeks or power users, their businesses really were growing 
  much better."
But even the geeks need help. A hefty 65 percent of owners said that they employed 
  some type of consultant or outside IT help, signaling demand for consultants 
  and other channel players. But what do small-business owners want from channel 
  partners?
Well, the biggest regrets among MB (as opposed to SMB) owners surveyed were 
  that they didn't take advantage of the technologies they did acquire (21 percent 
  said this) or that they didn't integrate technology strategically into their 
  business plans soon enough (18 percent). So, McCadney says, partners should 
  hit business owners with plans for strategic IT investment early and often -- 
  and emphasize that technology can make or break a small business; it's not just 
  a fun set of toys. 
"I would say number one, if they're working directly with business owners, 
  is get that business owner to slow down and realize that it's not a matter of, 
  'Can we afford to do this?' It's, 'Can we afford not to?'" McCadney says. 
And partners shouldn't leave customers hanging once a system is installed; 
  they should guide them through the sometimes painful process of getting it to 
  work and helping employees become accustomed to it.
"You need to have a healthy appreciation for technology," McCadney 
  says. "There is huge opportunity to actually work with the customer to 
  make sure that they fully know how to take advantage of what they have."
The bottom line from the survey: The more a small business is into IT, the 
  better its chances are for quick growth. And that's good news for partners who 
  know how to get that message across.
What are some of your SMB sales strategies? If you're a small-business owner 
  yourself, how important has an IT strategy been for you? Talk to me at [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Lee Pender on August 29, 20070 comments