A couple of years ago, my wife and I drove  to Des Moines, Iowa, to attend an event there. Because we  wanted to make a weekend of it, we booked a room at a new hotel on the east  edge of town. I printed out driving directions from Google Maps so we'd have a hardcopy  to guide us as we drove.
  We reached the exit on the interstate where  we were to turn left and cross the bridge over the highway to get to our hotel.  The only problem with this maneuver was that it directed us to an empty field.  In fact, the hotel was visible from the ramp, but to the right, rather than to  the left and across the bridge. I took matters into my own hands at that point  and decided, against the advice of Google Maps, that I was going to go my own  way.
  Long story short, the weekend was a lot of  fun, and we had a great stay at the hotel. The fact that the Google Maps data  was totally wrong was just an indication that you have to use common sense when  following directions.
  This whole situation is relevant to far more  than just going from point A to point B geographically. How many times have we  been installing or using computer software when we have to "adapt"  the instructions to what we actually see on the screen? How many times are the  assembly instructions for some consumer purchase less than clear, and we have  to work around that shortcoming? How many times has there been an article in a  newspaper or magazine that said one thing, and actually meant another, through  a misunderstanding on the part of the reporter? In all these situations, we  have to be active participants, rather than passive spectators blandly  accepting what we're given.
  In the case of Ms. Rosenberg, I won't say  she was stupid. She could well be called naïve, or gullible, to think that  walking along a highway that carries a lot of traffic is going to be a totally  safe activity. Did she have no one around her who could give her directions?  Was she incapacitated in some way? Who knows? Suing Google for what sounds like  her own carelessness seems typical of modern-day America, but I still think the suit  should be thrown out. I know enough, however, to expect that she'll get a  settlement, and probably her fifteen minutes of fame from all this, however undeserved.
  Will I use Google Maps in the future? You  bet. I've got it on my phone, and I've used it often. Will I trust it blindly?  No -- I've got far too much skepticism about the overall reliability of the  data that Maps includes to want to do that. But it is a very handy guide.
  Thanks for your reporting on this.
    -Dennis
  While I feel bad that Rosenberg was hit by a car  and feel that the Google mobile app is certainly lacking some important  features the full Web version has, she didn't use the good sense that God gave  her. This case should not see the inside of a courtroom. 
  Great writing. Please  keep it up.
    -Kevin
  If there were no cars  when she went down the street then it was a good idea. If there were a lot of  cars then it was probably a bad idea. But in the end, it was up to her to use  her best judgment according to the situation she found herself in and judging  by the result she made a bad choice. Can't blame that one on Google any more  than if I was using a GPS unit that said I could turn left, but the arrow on  the sign in front of me says I can only turn right.
    -Jim
  An imbecile, clearly.
  My car does not warn  me that if I drive it into a lake that I will likely drown.
    Food packages do not  warn me that if I eat too many frozen pizzas that I will barf.
    Washington does not warn us that if we elect stupid  leaders that our country will suffer.
  Shall I sue BMW? Tombstone Pizza? Obama?
  If I ever met Lauren,  I'd have two words for her (maybe four)
    "HUMAN  RESPONSIBILITY" and/or "COMMON SENSE."
    -Daniel 
  My vote -- Rosenberg was stupid.
    -Scott 
  Stupid is as stupid  does. Google is not at fault. She chose to walk down the road. If I told her to  jump off a bridge and she did it, would it be my fault? We are responsible for  our own decisions and actions. Now if she paid Google to instruct her where to  go, maybe she has a case. She will win her money just because Google will  desire her to go away quietly.
    -Joe 
  Why do people insist  on abdicating responsibility for their own actions? She should sue her parents  for not having a child smart enough to know not to go into an unsafe situation.
    -Deborah