Mailbag: On the Hunt for XP
    Now that most of you have thrown up your hands at Vista, 
Doug 
  asked what you're doing to get XP. Here's what some of you had to say:
   Here's a vote for staying with XP. We are finding it easier to buy XP 
    now than a year ago. Dell and HP have seen the light, for example, and make 
    is easy, but ONLY if you go through their business portals. We have found, 
    and many IT people agree, that if we are forced to, we will save and reuse 
    licenses we have already purchased when systems go out of service. OEM agreements 
    be damned. Call it a piece-by-piece upgrade if you want to split hairs about 
    OEM license restrictions.
   The effort to wipe a Vista system and install XP is nothing compared 
    to the headache of supporting it. It isn't about being new, misunderstood 
    or not giving it a chance. It is fundamentally flawed. What we see on the 
    consumer side is that people will buy Vista for personal systems and then 
    fight with it for months and then give up, seeking out people like us to fix 
    it by installing XP. Bad press had nothing to do with it. Sooner or later 
    Microsoft will realize that by not selling XP, Vista is not competing with 
    XP -- it is competing with the XP license I already have.
    -Derek
  Sticking with Windows XP certainly has some challenges. Often our effort 
    to "downgrade" PCs, laptops and tablets to XP results in missing 
    out on key features of the original load or compatibility issues. We've learned 
    to provide proven XP laptop/desktop loads, but there are still some issues. 
    We also stick with Lenovo for most of our needs, because they do provide XP 
    as an option. I'm betting other vendors are also seeing improved sales by 
    offering to pre-load Windows XP. For example, on some of their laptops even 
    consumers can choose: "Genuine Windows Vista Business with Windows XP 
    Professional Downgrade." Fully supported by their help desk and repair 
    centers.
    -Joe
  Well, this month I had to buy a new laptop. I really tried to avoid Dell, 
    because you have to pay an extra £60 for a downgrade. So I went to Lenovo, 
    and they still have some Thinkpads with XP; they're not as cutting-edge as 
    the "19-hour battery life" from Dell, but for school/work it's more 
    than welcome!
    -Anonymous
  Vista is a no-go zone. Microsoft cannot assume the role of bully in this 
    debate. First, it dumps an OS onto us that we did not have much say in developing. 
    The good features of XP were removed and the bad features of Vista were marketed 
    as if it was some sort of rock god. Vista is slow, no matter how Microsoft 
    spins it. It has nothing over XP except more cost -- significant additional 
    cost, at that. I don't care about eye candy or Aero; that's just fluff and 
    nonsense and I am not paying for it.
   I provide advice to Victorian government agencies and my advice has been: 
    Do not, under any circumstances, get into Vista. So far they all agree with 
    my view so I think Microsoft has more than just a major perception problem 
    on its hand. We will not be held ransom by Microsoft executives thinking they 
    can market or bully us into submission.
    -Ken
But a couple of you think that the complaints about Vista are much ado about 
  nothing:
   Amazing. I read the stories and see the commercials every day bashing 
    Vista. Jacksonville IT Services is the largest IT services company in Jacksonville, 
    Fla. and we see no problems with Vista across hundreds of companies and thousands 
    of users. In fact, most users would not dream of going back to XP. Is the 
    Vista perception being controlled like the stock market?
    -Howard 
  I am using Vista without problems. I think all the bad rap about Vista 
    is nonsense.
    -John
  I'm keeping the existing client PCs on XP Pro, but new machines are being 
    deployed with Vista Business or Ultimate. I don't like supporting two client 
    OSes, but I'm not crazy about putting money into obsolete technology, either. 
    The new Vista machines are going to our most tech savvy and enthusiastic users. 
    As the early adopters, these users will not object to minor deployment issues, 
    and will eventually help train their co-workers on Vista as we replace more 
    PCs.
    
    At the same time, I'm moving away from vendors whose software or drivers don't 
    work well on Vista. This late after release, there's no excuse for poor Vista 
    support, and I don't want to invest with vendors who choose not to embrace 
    new technology. Love Vista or hate it, but if you don't fully support the 
    currently shipping Microsoft OS over a year after release, I will not limit 
    my options by becoming or remaining your customer.
    -Dave
After Microsoft announced that it was offering 
  24x7 support, Doug asked readers whether they trust Microsoft to solve their 
  IT issues:
   Yes, absolutely! I have consistently found MS technical support to be 
    extraordinary. Do not feel the same way about TechNet's ability to assist 
    me, nor do I feel MS leverages the outstanding opportunity it has with Event 
    Viewer to solve technical issues.
    -Anonymous
Jeremy responds to a 
  letter we ran yesterday regarding Microsoft's backward compatibility:
   I'm sure I'm not the only one to respond to Fred's letter. A lot of us 
    in the IT community are begging for Microsoft to cut the umbilical cord already 
    and reduce backward compatibility. I for one look forward to "Midori."
   Fred, install VMware. If you haven't heard of it, it is great for those 
    that want to maintain compatibility while still being forward-thinking in 
    our overall architecture. Install Windows 3.x in a VM, convert your docs and 
    be done with the 16-bit days.
    -Jeremy
Finally, a reader experiences a problem with missing audio on Internet videos. 
  Got any tips for him?
   I was hoping you might know an expert (if you don't know the answer yourself) 
    who could help me with a problem that I can't seem to get an answer to. I 
    have Windows XP home edition with Service Pack 2 and it's running on a Dell 
    XPS 410. Everything has been going great with it until the last week or so. 
    A couple of days ago, I acquired a Trojan virus and was almost immediately 
    able to get rid of it, thanks to the anti virus I have running. I also found 
    some remnants of it in the registry and cleared that out. I also found three 
    or four files left in a Windows folder and deleted them. 
   After this event, I noticed that when I go on the Internet and view a 
    video (from YouTube or anywhere else), there is no sound. I can hear all sounds 
    on the PC, including music CDs in Windows Media Player and RealPlayer, and 
    any of the other sounds that Windows makes on Windows events. The only thing 
    I can't hear is the audio from the Internet. I really think the virus thing 
    has NOTHING to do with it, but I wanted to throw that in just in case. I have 
    searched the Internet for answers and found a few that have NOT solved my 
    problem. I have made sure "Play sounds in Web pages" and "Play 
    videos in Web pages" are checked under Internet options. I have made 
    sure the proper sound card is selected and the volumes turned up (not muted). 
    I'm frustrated and don't know what else to try, so I'm looking for some real 
    experts that might have some answers. Can you help me, or know who can?
    -Paul
Got any advice for Paul? Want to share your thoughts any of the topics we covered? 
  Leave a comment below or send an e-mail to [email protected].
 
	
Posted by Doug Barney on August 21, 2008