Pender's Blog

Blog archive

XP: The OS That Wouldn't Go Away

There's more bad news for Microsoft regarding Vista, if you can believe that. This week, a company called Devil Mountain Software that tracks such things said that 35 percent of PCs end up with "downgrades" from Vista to XP.

Downgrade, of course, is a relative term in this case. But for Microsoft -- and, to a lesser extent, its partners -- the failure of Vista to catch on with users represents a break in a rock-solid business model that has helped Redmond rocket to the top of the software world in recent decades.

Oh, sure, in the short term, the XP downgrades aren't such a bad thing. Users, after all, generally pay for a Vista license and then pay for XP downgrade rights. So Microsoft sells Vista no matter what and then gets a little kick from the XP downgrade. Great, right? For Microsoft, maybe -- for now.

But in the long term, we might look back on Vista as a turning point in Microsoft's history. After all, this is the first time we can remember that users have rejected in such large numbers a major -- "major" being a key word here, as Windows ME and Windows Bob weren't really in that category -- Windows update.

Maybe that doesn't matter in the long run. After all, users can't go on squeezing the last drops out of XP forever; they'll have to upgrade at some point, even if it's to Windows 7. And although Mac and Linux offerings might be picking up some momentum as a result of Vista's failures, those competitors still can't do much to seriously challenge Microsoft's market share, especially in the enterprise.

No, the real questions here concern how much damage Vista is doing to users' (and partners') confidence in Microsoft. And they're not just about whether folks will migrate to a different OS. Will Vista's problems lead users to look more closely at cloud computing -- a category Microsoft is desperately trying to get into -- which de-emphasizes the OS? Will Microsoft's insistence on forcing Vista on customers (and partners, for that matter) prompt enterprise users to think twice before they make investments in other Microsoft technologies...such as servers, where Linux actually has a bit of a foothold?

Microsoft's model for Vista (read: force users into upgrading by killing the previous OS) isn't new, and it has always worked in the past. But it's not working now. XP won't go away, and that makes the future for Windows in particular and Microsoft in general look a lot cloudier than it has in the past.

We're planning on running your Vista e-mails in tomorrow's RCPU...so contribute now to lpender@rcpmag.com.

Posted by Lee Pender on August 20, 2008 at 6:53 PM


Reader Comments

Fri, Aug 22, 2008 Crash USA

This blog means squat. 2000 is still on servers around the globe. If anyone cares to remember XP gained no traction against 2000 until after sp2 some 3 years later.
Go find some real news to discuss this is a red herring smelling up the place.

Thu, Aug 21, 2008

In response to Mark's and Beoweolf -
The question isn't whether Vista is better or not. It's whether or not you need it. Why should I bother switching to and learning a different OS when the one I have does everything I want it to do? Maybe consumers are getting a little tired of being told what they need and its time for MS, other companies, and self appointed opinionated experts like yourselves with that "we know what's best for you" attitude to start listening as well as talking.

And BTW, I'm an IT Coordinator and I decide what's best for my organization.

Thu, Aug 21, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

In response to Mark's and Beoweolf -
The question isn't whether Vista is better or not. It's whether or not you need it. Why should I bother switching to and learning a different OS when the one I have does everything I want it to do? Maybe consumers are getting a little tired of being told what they need and its time for MS, other companies, and self appointed opinionated experts like yourselves with that

Thu, Aug 21, 2008 Mark Denton, TX

Vista isn't that bad!!!
The reason that XP won't go away is two fold. 1st was that vendors weren't creating drivers as needed before roll out date. This created much publicity on Vista not working but was actually more of a hardware vendors refusing to or dragging their feet on Vista compliant drivers. Remember Windows 95 it had a similar problem but people were wanting it because Windows 3.11 was not even close to as good of OS. Now with XP being rock solid and well known and Vista with alot of XP similarities there is not the need to upgradeto Vista as when 95 came out.

2nd problem with Vista is journalists like yourself that keep on pounding and pounding on how Vista sux and is not ready for prime time. This drum beat has alot of casual users and smaller software vendors weary and very cautious when creating software and drivers for Vista. I use Vista, Linux, XP, and MAC,I think Vista is getting a bad rap. The things that the IT community asked for have for the most part been addressed. No it isn't perfect but it is a far cry from unusable as many journalists report.
In the near future most computers will not have any XP anything installed weather it is a Microsoft product there remains to be seen.

Just stop getting on the bashing train just for a ride.

Thu, Aug 21, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Vista isn't that bad!!!
The reason that XP won't go away is two fold. 1st was that vendors weren't creating drivers as needed before roll out date. This created much publicity on Vista not working but was actually more of a hardware vendors refusing to or dragging their feet on Vista compliant drivers. Remember Windows 95 it had a similar problem but people were wanting it because Windows 3.11 was not even close to as good of OS. Now with XP being rock solid and well known and Vista with alot of XP similarities there is not the need to upgradeto Vista as when 95 came out.

2nd problem with Vista is journalists like yourself that keep on pounding and pounding on how Vista sux and is not ready for prime time. This drum beat has alot of casual users and smaller software vendors weary and very cautious when creating software and drivers for Vista. I use Vista, Linux, XP, and MAC,I think Vista is getting a bad rap. The things that the IT community asked for have for the most part been addressed. No it isn't perfect but it is a far cry from unusable as many journalists report.
In the near future most computers will not have any XP anything installed weather it is a Microsoft product there remains to be seen.

Just stop getting on the bashing train just for a ride.

Thu, Aug 21, 2008 Beoweolf San Jose

Holding on to XP (especially when required to pay for 'downgrade' rights) is self defeating, bordering on mental illness. I will agree that in its initial release, driver support was a major headache, not mention the requirement to 'finally' retire a lot of 8, 16 even some wholly inadequate 32 bit peripherals. The fact is hardware as well as software was being hobbled by backwards compatibility. X86-64 processors have opened up a completely new benchmark for PC performance, there is no need to continue with the arbitrary designation of Workstation vs. PC. PC's, even Laptops have evolved to the point that its almost impossible to purchase an underpowered computer anymore, yet the client (and closet Luddites) are refusing to step up to the challenge.

The biggest complaint I still hear seems to be a lament that Vista is "too" good. Finally, MS creates what everyone was complaining about, security, stability and defaults that start secure and allow the user to decide how much compromise he is willing to endure for connectivity and communication. Despite being given nearly everything which magazine writers, Governments (national and international) and business concerns have lobbied for – we are faced with a consumer revolt, and wihat is it they are whining about – that it’s too difficult having to make a few minor adjustments to reap all the benefits. That driver compatibility (which peripheral providers had been warned years ago, would be needed) are somehow under the control of Microsoft. Maybe complaining to the Root cause entities is not nearly as satisfying as continuing to find something, anything - to justify mistaken animus toward Microsoft.

No wonder the term users, has settled as the universal name most used by IT personel in describing the uninitiated, mouth breathers that refuse accept any responsibility nor participation in the Security they demand.

At least, thats my sugar-coated point of view.

Thu, Aug 21, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Holding on to XP (especially when required to pay for 'downgrade' rights) is self defeating, bordering on mental illness. I will agree that in its initial release, driver support was a major headache, not mention the requirement to 'finally' retire a lot of 8, 16 even some wholly inadequate 32 bit peripherals. The fact is hardware as well as software was being hobbled by backwards compatibility. X86-64 processors have opened up a completely new benchmark for PC performance, there is no need to continue with the arbitrary designation of Workstation vs. PC. PC's, even Laptops have evolved to the point that its almost impossible to purchase an underpowered computer anymore, yet the client (and closet Luddites) are refusing to step up to the challenge.

The biggest complaint I still hear seems to be a lament that Vista is

Thu, Aug 21, 2008 Smartin Kansas

Just wait until IPV6 comes out in full force then we will see who really likes Vista or not.

Add Your Comments Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above