RCP Update

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

The Schwartz
Cloud Report

Blog archive

Is Microsoft Betting Too Much on the Cloud?

Microsoft International President Jean-Philippe Courtois earlier this month told Bloomberg that the company will spend a whopping 90 percent of its $9.6 billion research and development budget on cloud computing this year.

That brings up the question: Is Microsoft putting all its eggs in one basket? Sourya Biswas asks that same thing in a blog post this week. A proponent of cloud computing and, according to his LinkedIn profile, an MBA student at the University of Notre Dame and a former risk analytics manager at Citigroup,  Biswas wonders if Microsoft is throwing the baby out with the bathwater. He writes in his blog:

Make no mistake; I believe that cloud computing is the technology of and for the future. But allocating 90 percent of the research budget on an emerging technology without paying adequate attention to established products in which it has dominance is too big a risk in my book. Especially since that dominance is under threat, with the rise of Firefox and Chrome against the Microsoft Internet Explorer, and the growing popularity of Linux versus Microsoft Windows.

I believe there may be a sense of hubris in the way Microsoft is neglecting its established revenue lines. While its Windows still powers more than 80% of the computers in the world, there are several complaints against the operating system. In fact, many would argue that a lot of that $9.6 billion R&D should have been allocated to making the next edition of Windows bug-free, resource-light and malware-resistant.

Despite Microsoft's preaching that it is "all in" the cloud, the company has taken a measured approach at emphasizing that users will continue to work on local client devices and have access to their data offline.

While keeping its eye on rivals such as Google, Salesforce.com and Amazon Web Services, Microsoft needs to keep investing in technologies such as Windows, Office, SharePoint and Lync. Even if they all ultimately have substantial cloud components, the offline world will remain a critical component to users and Microsoft customers will expect significant investments in technologies that support the local device. I think Microsoft knows and understands this.

Time will tell what Microsoft's R&D emphasis will bring. But Biswas' point that Microsoft needs to invest in Windows and Internet Explorer is important. Do you think that Microsoft's plan to invest 90 percent of its R&D budget on cloud computing is going too far? Or is the company just putting a cloud tag on everything it does? Drop me a line at jschwartz@1105media.com.

Posted by Jeffrey Schwartz on April 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM


comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments

Wed, Apr 27, 2011 Jose Jimenez Los Angeles

Microsoft missed the internet in the 90s and I suspect they don't want a repeat with the "Cloud." No company "owns" the internet (regardless of how early or dominant they became). But, Microsoft does own a vast amount of products that generate real income. By placing 90% of R&D away from these products, they are placing at risk the loss of customers who may become frustrated with weak updates, shallow improvements and basically feeling ignored. The Cloud is still green and no amount of money is going do dictate the cloud standard. Users will do that. They may not like what MS did and they may go the way of Novell, They should invest 20% at most and the rest in reclaiming credibility in their existing products.

Wed, Apr 27, 2011 Tom

I have been working with PC's since the 8086 in the TI99A. I have spent much of that in the private sector and the last few years in the public sector. One thing that hasn't changed is an overall reluctance to place mission critical data outside of your control. Granted I have not worked with cloud computing enough to have a detailed idea of what happens to the data sent out to the cloud, but I have had much experience with other things that have been outsourced. Universally when you release control of something to an outside source there will be disappointment. Evidence the recent incident with the Sony playstation, this just echos many other recent events where data is compromised when it moves outside your 'sphere of influence'. I think it all has it's place to make your systems work bu it is only a part of the whole not the other way around. I would not personally turn my information over to an ouside source and I would not recommend doing it in an enterprise situation either.

Add Your Comments Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above