Pender's Blog

Blog archive

Microsoft: Friendlier or Just Less Threatening?

Your editor is swamped with other responsibilities this week, so expect some short RCPUs. (Yes, we always say that and it never happens, but it's going to happen this week.)

There's an interesting article in the San Francisco Chronicle this week about how Silicon Valley has warmed to Microsoft over the last decade or so. The paper offers a couple of explanations for the thawing of relations between Redmond and the Valley.

First, there's the notion that Microsoft really is a friendlier company, that it was humbled by the U.S. antitrust suit of the '90s and that its leaders decided after that to be more open and friendly with the industry. The second possible explanation is that Microsoft just isn't the threat it used to be and competitors and partners alike don't hate Redmond because, with the importance of the operating system on the decline, there is less about Redmond to hate. Microsoft is old money now, the thinking goes, and the really obnoxious new kids on the block -- as well as the biggest threat to the industry as a whole -- are new money (read: Google).

We're convinced of Microsoft's staying power as a company, but we kind of lean toward explanation No. 2 -- if the issue is binary, which it probably isn't -- as to why Microsoft isn't such a pariah anymore. Sure, Microsoft has opened up to the software industry and open source somewhat (and sometimes) and has introduced some transparency and flexibility into its operations. But Microsoft is like the Dallas Cowboys (and here, your editor sheds a tear): a once-dominant behemoth that's still successful but just doesn't scare competitors the way it used to. Well, OK, Microsoft is a lot more dominant and successful than the Cowboys, but you get what we're going for here.

We're wondering what changes you, Microsoft partners, have perceived in recent years regarding opinions of Microsoft. Is Microsoft -- and are you, as the company's sales force -- meeting less industry resistance these days than you did, say, 10 years ago? Twenty years ago? And, if so, do you think it's because Microsoft has played better with its industry friends or because it's not as scary as Google is now? Or both? Send your thoughts to lpender@rcpmag.com.

Posted by Lee Pender on December 01, 2009 at 10:28 AM


Reader Comments

Tue, Dec 1, 2009 Eric Over The World

Not really convinced from the openness of Microsoft. As much as I am bluffed by their support, OCS R2 with "bugs" (regression on purpose!?!?!?!?) on APIs as much as the strategy to change completely APIs every two years is not what I call being open. As much as for the ‘Boys, they’ll do great this year ;)

Tue, Dec 1, 2009 Don Alabama

The biggest change is forced change for the sake of monetizing their products instead of truly delivering value with new features. This is required by economics and profit rather than market demand for additional functionality. I'm tired of their monetizing policy and changing locations of functions that don't require change other than to force excessive retraining cost. Is that redundant, yes, just like Microsoft......again..... As an American, I love them and want them to stay strong and not sell out the software industry overseas like so many other American industries have (read manufacturing).

Tue, Dec 1, 2009 John Nelson San Francisco

Living in the hub of "anti-Microsoft", I can state there's been a major distinction between Microsoft the OS and Server VS. Microsoft the provider of the .NET development environment. While .NET has been strongly coupled with it's OS and Servers, I will notice a huge bi-polar switch when I discuss the magic of C# with anti-MS people vs. the the OS. When I talk about the benifits and my reasons as to why I've loved .NET for so many years, I'll have many agree with me. Or at least take it seriously. But when I discuss the ins and outs of features with the OS, I'll get the "BAH...Microsoft" response. I don't care. Windows 7 has been my best friend for many months now, and I'm a fantatic of Windows Server 2008(R2 as well)

Tue, Dec 1, 2009 Ken McAvoy Melbourne , Australia

My experience is the exact opposite. Since Vista - all my clients are now starting to look seriously at Linux and Apple in ways they never would have before. There is a distinct anti Microsoft sentiment developing because of their view Microsoft refuses to give them as client groups the things that they say matter to them.10 years ago I never perceived any major degree of angst against Microsoft - now I do tenfold. Ken

Tue, Dec 1, 2009 Trent Taylor Kitchener, ON Canada

I have had the, well I don't want to call it a pleasure, but all the same dealings with Microsoft for my last 23 years in IT. I cannot speak for others but I don't think my perception has changed that much however I think it is more that I have become accustomed to their modus operandi and have learn't to deal with it. Just like all good IT departments learn how to stablize their environments even though the foundation has a few good cracks in it. I will tell you this, due to the inefficiencies in their products I have become one of extremely skilled at 'fly by the seat of your pants' technical troubleshooting!

Add Your Comments Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above