Pender's Blog

Blog archive

OOXML: The Return of the Champ

This is the way it used to be when the New York Yankees were dominant, when the Steelers or 49ers were winning Super Bowls, and when Manchester United couldn't be stopped (and, actually, those days for Man U seem to be returning). They might fall behind here and there, maybe lose a game, maybe even lose a championship...but then they would collect themselves, rally and unleash fury upon their hapless opponents, reminding them who was boss after all. That's pretty much what Microsoft did with Office Open XML.

Oh, Redmond has taken it on the chin lately. The EU got a shot or two in. Google has been working the body. Apple publicly humiliated Microsoft with the best ad campaign of at least the last 25 years, and Redmond mostly wounded itself with Vista. But this week, the champ came storming back the way champions do -- love them or hate them (and please, please don't get your editor started on any of the sports teams listed above; he hates or once hated them all).

By the time you read this, OOXML will be an industry standard. Yes, that's right -- after failing the first time to garner the required number of votes, Microsoft's document format roared back and won the approval of the International Organization for Standardization. That means that Microsoft has legitimacy in the eyes of an independent -- well, more or less independent -- standards body.

Of course, we're sure that Microsoft, uh, strongly encouraged a few delegates from a few nations to change their votes -- which lots of delegates did. And, really, OOXML's acceptance isn't all that big of a deal for partners and users, practically speaking; after all, Microsoft document formats are also de facto standards.

But now, all of those government agencies charged with implementing standards-based computing are free to turn away from open source and run back to sweet mama Microsoft if they so choose. And whatever momentum open source had gained by taking the standards route in IT departments has certainly slowed -- if not come to a screeching halt.

Really, though, what can we learn from this event? There's an old boxing adage that says that a challenger has to knock out the champ in order to beat him; a decision by the judges will never do. Well, in this case, nobody could knock out the champ -- not the open source movement, not rival vendors, not bloggers, not the trade press. OOXML's status as a standard might not affect our everyday work lives all that much, but it does remind us of one thing: Microsoft is still Microsoft, and, when it wants to be, Microsoft is still the boss.

What's your take on OOXML becoming a standard? How powerful do you feel Microsoft still is in the technology industry? Sound off at lpender@rcpmag.com.

Posted by Lee Pender on April 02, 2008 at 6:53 PM


Reader Comments

Sat, Apr 12, 2008 Keith Guthmiller Surrey, BC

Why should we really worry about the Microsoft adoption? The way I see it, why not let them and their partners have it. For the rest of the real world, let us just adopt the open source and use it ourselves. Don't worry about compatibility issues. The best technology will come out on top while the inferior will fade away. And I believe open source implementations wiil emerge victorious. Why? Because there are more people concerned with fairness, freedom, and fair play than Microsoft has money. Money only buys illusions. Caring buys freedom.

Wed, Apr 9, 2008 Paul IN

I think it is great that OOXML is now a standard. Some people need to get a life and get off the MS is evil kick. I like many of the products MS makes. Some features I like some I hate. It is a good thing to have a standard that will preserve the look of a Word document. ODF does not do that. It is good to have ODF as an alternate standard. Having choices is good.

Mon, Apr 7, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Good job! A standard that nobody (not even Microsoft) implements -- and that in all probability nobody can implement.

Industry leadership, Microsoft style!

Mon, Apr 7, 2008 Rajmund Vilnius

Yeah, your "champion" is overweight, steroid-spiked sumo wrestler, who broke the ring with his weight and now considers himself a "champ" only based on that fact. Here in Europe, we have a political "champion" employing methods similar to M$. His name is Alexander Lukashenko (and really, if you don't know - wchich I do NOT expect from the likes of Lee Pender - google it).

Sun, Apr 6, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Call yourself a journalist?
Well nobody else will!

Sun, Apr 6, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Microsoft, still the bully, they can't fool all of the people all of the time.

Sun, Apr 6, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

You sound like you've taken several punches too many to the frontal lobe.

Sun, Apr 6, 2008 maple Vilnius

yeah, a big "champ" on expensive anabolic steroids. what is use of your bulging muscles you throw around, when all the other parts are shrunk and you've won the competition not by your strenghth, but by paying off the jury? consider this sports reference as more suitable for all this office "open" "xml" "competition".

Sat, Apr 5, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

I see you're getting a lot of support in your comments section, Lee.

Here's a piece of advice - if you want even more positive comments you should do a blog on the hitherto unrecorded positive aspects of paedophilia.

Sat, Apr 5, 2008 Verne Australia

Id just like everyone to know that i make web pages. I made a great web page on windows vista and saved it in the documents folder. I now have an icon and an empty file. Presumably from an update from microsoft. If this is the latest operating system and OOXML is the latest office offering then they are in serious trouble. No company business or anyone wants to lose a lot of work. Goodbye Microsoft forever.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 saul Anonymous

When true champions make a comeback, they do so by hard work, dedicated practice, or getting better players and coaching. They don't do it by bribing refs or spiking their opponents Gatorade.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

If there ever is a strict OOXML reference implementation, and if there is a switch that makes Microsoft Office whatever produce strict OOXML compliant documents, and if Microsoft promises never to change that without updating the standard and getting that update approved *first*,

then Microsoft Office whatever's document format will be in an international standard form, and will meet the requirements for "open specification" this article is dealing with. Until then I'll stick with one I know I will be allowed to read in 5 years.

Don't worry, I won't hold my breath.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Cyfaill Portland

A real champion of standards does not need to resort to bribes, payoffs or force. Microsoft is not a champion beyond the realm of brutality.
The ISO may as yet come to its senses and realize that the vote was pure coercion of the voting process itself. The ISO needs to take a hit on the chin (sport metaphor if you like) for its failure to be a stand up player.
The document compliant international standard ISO/IEC 26300:2006 already was established in 2006. It is referred to as ODF. The OOXML is a second politically motivated "standard" designed to slow down the uptake of open standards. You know that, as well as many now do.
In this case the document standard for the ISO world standard was designed to be platform independent. Platform independence is the last thing Microsoft wants and their latest forceful battle "win" will backfire. The standard needs to stand up for the future whether or not Microsoft exists. To be polite, that is the failure with their specifications for OOXML. Remove Microsoft from the supplier of needed platforms and the specification is then quite useless.
The passage of this ISO temporary (not yet actually certified) specification is in fact very tragic.
It shows the vulnerability of voting standards for the ISO itself because in spite of the bias of the author of this article... Had not Microsoft bought off and spiked the voting process this specification would have died as a technical disaster a year ago.
To be clear about this OOXML "standard",,, It is not implemented anywhere, yet... whereas ODF is.
Control of the future of all digital documents is what is at the heart of this war. If Microsoft losses, as it needs to, they are so against interoperability, then indeed this marks the beginning of the end of their total world domination of Office products and the Microsoft platform itself. They have not won, but the world did loose a trusted specification organization because the failure was with the ISO for not standing up to corruption of a high order and so obvious and predictable presentation as Microsoft can make. Microsoft is nothing more than what Microsoft is and the world will grow beyond its corruption someday. Go ahead parade you battle belt over your head like a "champion" wrestler... as the rest of us look at the stage buckling beneath your over adorned feet.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 mike kalamazoo

and you are going to pretend that you have been paying attention to whether the process was co-opted, and whether a proprietary format is appropriate as a standard (hint: it isn't, it's proprietary) unless 100% of the format is documented, so competition can render identical output. there is NO reason to believe that microsoft will ever document 100% of its language, regardless of the vague assertions that they will.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Renato S. Yamane Brazil

Who somebody know how can I scroll this page with wheel's mouse in Mozilla Firefox?
Standards, standards, standards, but you don´t follow W3C standards to make this web site compatible with all browsers.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Ed Anonymous

Looking at this site briefly, it looks to me like a Microsoft fan site. Odd that the comments in this forum are all so negative. Maybe Microsoft needs to buy the rest of us off, too.

Also, just to point out - OOXML is not a standard yet. There's a two month period during which formal appeals to the vote can be made. While I have no doubt all the formal appeals will be summarily dismissed, and thus suggest the answer to the question of who was paid off above, it will still take two months before it is official.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Those teams don't bribe the referees to win.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Illinois Roy Anonymous

The champ won the contest but had to bite off the opponent's ear to do it. I went to Best Buy to buy a new laptop to replace a damaged Windows XP machine but when I found out my old hardware and software may or may not work and that Vista uses half a gig of memory to just idle I went to the Mac section and bout a MacBook. I suppose you can say I said "to hell with boxing, I will go to a soccer game instead. Open Office and .odt files are fine with me and if someone needs to receive .doc files I will send them a parchment letter through the Snail Mail protocol.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

In this instance Microsoft isn't the champ, they are the bookmaker that had so much invested that they paid the team members to throw the game. They new the odds are so against them winning without paying for the outcome to come out in their favor.

We all watched the game and know that it was fixed. The players? If they ever had any reputation it is badly tarnished and the investigation will only make it worse for everyone involved in the fix.


Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Yagotta B. Kidding Anonymous

I'm not sure what kind of message it sends when The Champ is shown on-camera loading up his gloves with lead shot. Is this Championship Boxing or WWF?

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Yeah, like Robert Mugabe is still the 'champ' in Zimbabwe - or will be when he fixes the presidential run-off. No doubt, he was one of those country leaders who Bill Gates called.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Would that be the 49ers that were run by a convicted felon, who circumvented league rules to build their dynasty, and who have now spent years trying to claw their way back out of mediocrity?

Yeah, they were good once, but they don't seem to have so many fans these days.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Andre Switzerland

We would all have won if one unique standard for office applications had been decided upon. As I understand it, Microsoft refused the invitation to work on ODF in order to develop OOXML, which is best described as an application specific collection of formats. This will come as a needless cost, economic, cultural and monetary to the world community that will, as another post suggests, "affect the archiving of our society's documents for years to come". There's no champ - only a self-centered bully with no vision.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Bill Redmond

"OOXML" may well become an ISO standard. But there is no product, not from Microsoft, not from anyone, that actually implements the standard, fully and correctly. Anyone looking for an office standard with multiple, independent implementations still has only one choice. And, with their slightly veiled threats of patent suits, Microsoft apparently intends that nobody is able to fully implement OOXML, either.

Microsoft isn't really the "champ" here. Just a big bully throwing their weight around. Very few people really care about any given standard, and this is no different. But more people do care about honest and ethical behaviour, and in that, I think, Microsoft has again sullied themselves.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

Actually I think you'll find that it is *not* an ISO accredited standard. To be a standard there needs to be a document defining standard to be voted on. There is no such document. After the ISO BRM Micosoft were supposed to give to the voting countries a copy of the standard where there BRM issues were addressed. This has not happened. This means that the ISO vote was on an unseen standards document - which is by definition not a public standard. The ISO broke their own rules in voting on it. My guess - There will need to be a revote.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 Mitch Smith Cambridge, MA

I wonder whether the government agencies you mention really are as free as you suggest to run back to "mama Microsoft"; MS Office doesn't yet implement OOXML in anywhere near a compliant way, and considering the "quality" of the spec, I don't imagine it'll be able to any time soon.

Fri, Apr 4, 2008 sdm Canada

Thank you for this article. I can't think of a better way to illustrate the problem with Microsoft and OOXML any better than this. A boxing match...yikes...so totally missing the point it is hard to believe.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 wvhillbilly Anonymous

OOXML is as much a legitimate standard as a degree bought and paid for from some diploma mill is. Any approval as a standard obtained as OOXML's was, by manipulation and deceit and trickery, isn't worth the paper it's written on. Further, OOXML is full of unresolved defects, encumbered by patents, broken by proprietary extensions, so complex it would be nearly impossible for anyone to implement, and hasn't even been implemented by Microsoft itself, from what all I've read from other web sites.

ODF on the other hand obtained its approval as a standard fairly and squarely, no cheating, no manipulation, none of the dirty tricks used by M$ to get OOXML approved, and as I recall was approved unanimously. It is a true open standard, freely available to any and all who want to implement it, is licensable under the GPL (which OOXML by design is not), and ensures interoperability between any implementation of it and any other implementation of it. It has already been implemented in Open Office and I believe is currently being implemented by others.

Can you say that of OOXML? I don't think so.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Sean Keeney Cheltenham, UK

This isn't a football game, it's a decision that will affect the archiving of a huge lump of our society's documents for years to come. Quit with the cheer leading idiocy.

Also, I seem to remember George W proclaiming victory after a week of 'shock and awe'. Remind me how that turned out again? Microsoft have bought the battle, it doesn't mean they'll win the war.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 J-F Bilodeau Ottawa, ON

I fail to see how Microsoft is still the champ. They put on a strong face, but behind it all, they can't seem to get their act together. Thankfully, they have a huge warchest to keep them up, but what will happen once they spend all their money trying to buy (back) their vendor, customers, partners, consultant, bloggers and whatever else?
One day, they have to compete based on the quality of their software instead of the depth of their pockets.
I look forward to that day.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Anonymous Freetard Anonymous

W0W, just W0W
lets not forget folks that this means OOXML is --A-- standard now, not necessarily --THE-- standard.
ODF is still --A-- standard too, ISO approved long before OOXML was even pushed out of Micro$oft's doors.
To the author: Please, PLEASE, put down the kool-aid!
God knows how much you are getting "compensated," but that was laying it on a little too THICK. M$ produces insecure, unstable software and EVERYONE with half a brain knows it.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Dave UK

This article sounds like the playground bully crowing because he won by thumping anyone who disagreed with him.

You don't claim that OOXML was accepted on its technical merits, rather that it was accepted because MS threw it's weight around and thumped people.

If that is all MS has to be proud of, then MS really is on the way down.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Dave Boston, MA

> What's your take on OOXML becoming a standard?

I think that it was clear from the outset that nobody really wanted OOXML to be a standard except for MS and its business partners. It benefits nobody except them and stacks the decks in their favor because the licensing makes it impossible for Open Source projects to use and its quality as a standard makes it cost prohibitive for commercial shops to make products that comply. MS clearly bought its way to standardization instead of making it a technically superior format that would stand on its own merits.

> How powerful do you feel Microsoft still is in the technology industry?

I think MS is on the same path as IBM was, and unless it makes a drastic course correction soon, it's going to take them a decade to recover as well. People are sick and tired of them always being the bully, and its behavior though the OOXML standardization process has demonstrated that its incapable of competing on a level playing field.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

You don't really have to. Migration might be challenge, but it's certainly doable.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

What's your take on OOXML becoming a standard?
=> Its a waste of time as it doesn't take a genius to figure out that its merely a mechanism to protect the profits of Microsoft Office. (Ironically, the implementation of OOXML in Office 2007 isn't the same as the one that was pushed through).

How powerful do you feel Microsoft still is in the technology industry?
=> I think all they've demonstrated is that there is NO integrity, NO values, NO ethics in what they do. As far as I'm concerned, it confirms my decision was the right one in cancelling our contract with Microsoft.

All this tells me, is that Microsoft is unable to compete fairly, if it tried. OOXML has no technical merit behind it. They've had to destroy the reputation of ISO to achieve their objective.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

To be more blunt, I wonder who was paid off. This just makes me think that Microsoft can be counted on to do business in an unethical way. It seems that's the way they have gained dominance and that is the way they will keep it. It makes me even more desirous of getting free of their products. If I didn't have to use them I wouldn't.

Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Anonymous Anonymous

In order to gain approval MS had to recruit computer illiterate microstates who had no idea what this was all about, suborn other members, lay out financial and business incentives to others and finally debase and devalue the entire ISO process.

A "victory" only in name methinks and, unlike a fairly won contest, hardly something to be proud of.

Distaste for MS's "ethics" and business practices is increasing.

Mac


Thu, Apr 3, 2008 Guest Anonymous

Lee, before you get too excited you might want to see how the viewing public reacts to an analysis of the fight. The fight came across more as a street brawl than a proper fight.

There is a reasonable chance that the champ will get sanctioned. What is worse we may be seeing replays daily of some of the questionable punches replaying daily on sports center.

Add Your Comments Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above