News

Windows 8 Tablets To Feature Display Improvements

Some upcoming Windows 8 tablets will feature screen displays that are near Apple iPad quality, Microsoft said last week in a "Building Windows 8" blog post. At the very least, they will have comparable screen specs.

Many Windows 8 tablets will have "pixel densities of at least 135 DPI -- much higher than many of us are used to," wrote David Washington, a senior program manager on Microsoft's user experience team. Currently, Windows 8 is available as a "consumer preview" beta.

Pixel density is one measure of the quality of a display and describes how many pixels occupy a specific screen area, as measured in dots per inch (DPI) or pixels per inch. Washington added that there also will be "HD tablets" running Windows 8 with pixel densities of about 190 DPI and "quad-XGA tablets" with pixel densities of about 253 DPI.

In contrast, Apple's latest 4G iPad, which had its debut this month, has a "Retina" display with a pixel density of 264 PPI. That's twice the iPad 2's XGA display, which has a pixel density of 132 PPI.

Windows 8 is designed to support three pixel density scale factors. At 100 percent pixel density, there is no scaling. HD tablets, in contrast, have displays that are capable of 140 percent pixel density scalability. Windows 8 quad-XGA tablets will be capable 180 percent pixel density scalability.

As for Apple, its latest iPad has a 200 percent pixel density scale factor. Apple has total control over its hardware specs. It only has to support this one scale factor, according Washington.

"Because [Apple] iOS and developers only need to support the predefined resolutions, they only need to design for this one additional scaling factor," Washington stated.

Microsoft also redesigned screen resolution standards for Windows 8. The aim was to make coding easier for developers, according to Washington. While the old standard for screen resolutions was designing for an 800 x 600 pixels size, Microsoft selected a minimum screen resolution for Windows 8 at 1024 x 768 pixels. Washington argued that Web designers already are accustomed to building Web sites at this 1024 x 768 pixels size. Moreover, applications running in virtual machines can be "easily" supported at that screen resolution or lower, he contended.

However, one big reason why Microsoft threw out the old 800 x 600 pixels standard in building Windows 8 is that it just doesn't display as much content when used with Metro-style apps. The optimal minimum screen resolution that supports all of Windows 8's Metro features is 1366 x 768 pixels, Washington said. That's the same screen resolution seen with the Samsung Series 7 tablet, which was shown off at Microsoft's Build conference in September. It's at that resolution that the screen will accommodate Microsoft's Metro user interface "snap" feature, which allows a second application to be displayed on the same screen.

With Microsoft's Metro UI in Windows 8, applications run in full-screen mode. Two Metro-style applications can't occupy a single screen except by using the snap feature. Washington noted that it may seem "counter-intuitive" that the Windows 8 Metro UI design doesn't let users resize application windows, but Microsoft felt that developers weren't optimally developing their apps to address such resizing anyway.

"But as we look across many apps and the ever expanding screen sizes available to us all, it has become clear that developers are no longer optimizing for the diversity of screens available," Washington explained in the blog.

Windows 8 also has a second UI for so-called "desktop-style" apps, which provides a more traditional Windows 7-like experience. Apparently, desktop apps running on Windows 8 won't have all of these window-sizing restrictions, but Microsoft considers them as being akin to legacy solutions and is concentrating on selling Metro-style apps through its new Windows Store.

Microsoft may not be keeping pace with the current market leaders as represented by Android and Apple iOS in the tablet mobile device space, but it is touting the notion that it will be fairly easy to repurpose HTML5 applications built for other platforms to run on the new Windows Runtime in Windows 8. For instance, this Microsoft case study describes how to take an Apple application and redesign it to work with the capabilities in Windows 8. An increased number of developers working on the Windows Runtime side may help Microsoft catch up in the tablet market.

Windows 8, when released, is expected to run on devices of various sizes, on both x86 and ARM machines. The ARM-based devices, in particular, are expected to expand the form-factor choices available to users.

See Also:

About the Author

Kurt Mackie is online news editor for the 1105 Enterprise Computing Group.

comments powered by Disqus

Reader Comments

Sat, Nov 3, 2012

watch on youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTj8xxpkmVE&feature=related to enable the resolution of 1024x600 to 1024x768

Mon, Aug 20, 2012

Hogiebot, this is a consequence of having to use the ridiculous Metro style for everything - it's blocky rectangular chunks consume screen real estate for no useful purpose - other than making it easy to define the boundaries of buttons (no rounded corners or ovals to worry about by the dumbed-down user IF). At the other end, high resolution displays equivalent to the new iPad aren't allowed for, either. And no one is mentioning the actual color space or bit depth of the displays - again areas where the MS OS support falls short. Bad design decision after bad design decision. I hope that Win8 fails badly. Not because I'm anti-MS, but because they would have to quickly fix all these stupidities they have put into both "Window" (no longer plural) RT and Windows 8 desktop.

Tue, Mar 27, 2012 Hoagiebot

My absolute biggest complaint about Windows 8 Consumer Preview is with the 1024 x 768 minimum resolution that Microsoft, apparently with little rational forethought all the different kinds of hardware people would be trying to run windows 8 on beforehand, chose for Windows 8 Metro apps.

When I got a brand new Acer Aspire one D255E netbook a couple of weeks ago I decided to replace the copy of Windows 7 Starter Edition that came on it with Windows 8 Consumer Preview to try it out. The Windows 8 operating system seemed to run on the netbook just fine at first, at least until I tried to run a Metro app. When I did, I promptly got the message "This app can't open. The screen resolution is too low for this app to run," displayed on my screen.

As you have probably already guessed, the Acer Aspire one netbook that I got came with a 1024x600 native resolution screen, so none of the Metro apps would open due to that 1024x768 minimum resolution requirement that this article mentioned. What blows my mind however is that Microsoft would choose to have 1024x768 as their minimum screen resolution in the first place when there are literally *millions* of netbooks out there that have 1024x600 screens. I mean really, are those extra 168-pixels in the vertical dimension so important that it is worth alienating literally millions of netbook PC's that could otherwise run Windows 8 just fine for? I think that it is especially ludicrous that Microsoft chose 1024x768 as their minimum resolution for Metro instead of 1024x600 now that I know that they did it to optimize their tablets to display webpages that are 1024-pixels *wide.* Really, Microsoft? A 1024x600 resolution screen is also 1024-pixels wide, and would be able to display those same webpages almost just as well! Had you chose that resolution you wouldn't be alienating every single netbook PC that has been produced over the last few years!

With all of the mass media scare-artists out there wildly proclaiming that "the PC is dying," you would think that Microsoft would want Windows 8 to be able to run on as much hardware as possible, including the Acer netbook that I bought two weeks ago. Or does Microsoft expect that all netbooks should just be stuck with Windows 7 Starter edition forever?

For gosh sakes Microsoft-- either make the minimum resolution for Metro apps 1024x600, or at the very least allow those Metro apps to run on a 1024x600 screen with a vertical scrollbar so that I can scroll down to see the unseen 168 pixels at the bottom of the screen. Don't make the Metro apps not work at all, or force me to do a registry hack to enable blurry and distorted "display down scaling" just to see them! Having no Metro apps in Windows 8 just makes Windows 8 into "Windows 7 Pointlessly Annoying Edition!"

Add Your Comments Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above