Bekker's Blog

Blog archive

The Bottom-Up Phenomenon of Microsoft Metro

It's natural to assume that the Metro UI popping up on nearly all of Microsoft's screens -- from Windows Phone to Windows 8 to Xbox -- is being pushed down to the product groups from on high. More ammunition for that point of view came from the Microsoft keynote at the Consumer Electronics Show this month, when CEO Steve Ballmer and others mentioned "Metro" 27 times (you can count them in the transcript).

Nonetheless, that impression would be wrong, according to Joe Belfiore, corporate vice president of Windows Phone Management. In an interesting interview posted today on Fast Company's Co. Design site, Belfiore told writer Austin Carr:

"We're at a point in our history where the product groups, by and large, operate independently -- they make decisions that they think are best for their customers and users," Belfiore says. "It's not a case where there's a top-down mandate: everyone go do this. ... There are few cases where senior management says, 'Everyone is going to do this.' Those [instances] are the exceptions rather than the rule."

Carr compares the situation to Apple's with Steve Jobs as the design czar and argues that Microsoft needs someone dictating the UI.

I'm less convinced that Microsoft isn't exerting pressure on all product groups to go with Metro -- or I should say, that the company won't exert that pressure when it matters. The Windows Phone team had already decided to use the Zune-inspired interface, and Xbox was another early convert. Windows chief Steven Sinofsky apparently decided to take the Windows client to Metro because it makes sense in light of the all-consuming focus on the tablet market.

All the product groups may be finding Metro on their own right now -- each for their own reasons. They're converging on a Metro idea that Ballmer and other senior leaders appear to love.

My sense is that the issue of UI control will come up in a future release, when somebody decides Metro is no longer in a particular product group's interest. At that point, I'd be surprised if the company famous for exerting a Windows "strategy tax" on other product groups will be so laissez-faire about the UI.

What's your take? Leave a comment below or e-mail me at sbekker@rcpmag.com.

Posted by Scott Bekker on January 19, 2012 at 3:59 PM


Reader Comments

Sat, Jan 21, 2012 Scott Bekker Redmond Channel Partner

@Brian That's a really interesting idea. It's a possible area for a good use of the 2 (or 3 or 4) screens and a cloud concept.

Thu, Jan 19, 2012 Brian Bartlett United States

One modification I would like to see on the Microsoft Windows end of the house is to have each PC present all of the home Metro UI 'front-pages' that displays each users phone/tablet/pc Metro UI page in a block on part of the screen. Then each user, as they come by, has the opportunity to log-in, using a visual touch pass-code (YOUR image with a required sequence of touches on that image), naturally, so they can drill into *their* particular unified Metro page(s). Given something like that, its a natural fit for homes where not everyone has a tablet and actually gives some justification for the Metro UI's ubiquity, as well as ubiquitous Windows everywhere. Just my two cents. [Hell, it might even ressurect a role for a Windows home server or individual VMs in Windows 8.]

Add Your Comments Now:

Your Name:(optional)
Your Email:(optional)
Your Location:(optional)
Comment:
Please type the letters/numbers you see above